Campolo v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 37

ORDER Granting 36 Stipulation. Discovery due by 2/29/2012. Motions due by 4/3/2012. Cross Motions due by 4/24/2012. Responses due by 5/15/2012. Replies due by 6/5/2012. Motion Hearing set for 6/21/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken.Case Management Statement due by 6/14/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/21/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/4/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 NORDHOFF ST. NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 12 13 14 JORDAN S. ALTURA (SBN: 209431) jaltura@gordonrees.com JOEL A. MORGAN (SBN: 262937) jmorgan@gordonrees.com GORDON & REES LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 Attorneys for Defendants AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; OFFICE DEPOT TEMPORARY DISABILITY PLAN and OFFICE DEPOT LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN CORINNE CHANDLER, ESQ. (SBN: 111423) cchandler@kantorlaw.net BRENT DORIAN BREHM, ESQ. (SBN: 248983) bbrehm@kantorlaw.net KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, CA 91324 Telephone: (818) 886-2525 Facsimile: (818) 350-6272 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN CAMPOLO 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 JOHN CAMPOLO, 20 Plaintiff, 21 v. 22 23 24 25 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; OFFICE DEPOT TEMPORARY DISABILITY PLAN; OFFICE DEPOT LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN; Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. C10-05634 CW (JSCx) JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES CASE NO. C10-05634 CW 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff John 2 Campolo (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”), Office Depot 3 Temporary Disability Plan, and Office Depot Long Term Disability Plan (collectively the 4 “Office Depot Plan”) (“Aetna and the Office Depot Plan are collectively referred to herein as 5 “Defendants”) by and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: 6 Plaintiff served discovery on the Defendants in March and September, 2011. Plaintiff 7 granted Defendants extensions to respond to this discovery and the parties sought an extension of 8 the discovery cut-off from December 16, 2011 until January 6, 2012. (Docket No. 27) The Court 9 granted that stipulation. (Docket No. 29) 10 Following receipt of discovery responses that Plaintiff considered to contain inappropriate objections and insufficient responses, on November 21, 2011, the parties 12 KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 NORDHOFF ST. NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 11 conducted the LR 37-1 meet and confer. During this meet and confer, Defendants’ counsel 13 represented that supplemental responses curing many of Plaintiff’s concerns would be provided 14 by the end of the month. Defendants did not provide supplemental responses by the end of the 15 month. 16 17 18 On November 23, 2011, the Court granted the parties stipulated protective order regarding the confidentiality of information. (Docket No. 31) On December 7, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel. (Docket No. 32) That Motion, 19 and all further discovery motions, was referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. 20 (Docket No. 33 & 34) On December 8, 2011, Defendants produced additional information in 21 response to the discovery. The parties again engaged in discussions regarding Plaintiff’s 22 concerns with Defendants’ supplemental responses. Defendants agreed to provide supplemental 23 responses, but following Plaintiff’s request, could not provide a date upon which those 24 supplemental responses would be produced to Plaintiff. 25 On December 14, 2011, Judge Corley held a telephonic discovery conference with the 26 parties. (Docket No. 34) Based on the parties representation that some of the sought-after 27 discovery had been produced, and that Defendants were working to provide further supplemental 28 responses (which Defendants represented had been delayed due to the holidays and a shortage of JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES -1- CASE NO. C10-05634 CW 1 staff), Judge Corley dismissed Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, without prejudice, and ordered the 2 parties to bring any unresolved discovery matters before the Court through a joint discovery 3 letter. (Docket No. 35) 4 During the telephonic discovery conference the issue of sufficient time to fully complete 5 discovery within the currently set discovery cut-off was discussed with Judge Corley. The parties 6 each represented their willingness to seek an extension of dates in order to work towards 7 resolving any discovery issues prior to any cut-offs. 8 9 The parties have continued to work toward resolving Plaintiff’s concerns regarding Defendants’ discovery responses. To date, Defendants have not provided Plaintiff with further supplemental responses. Plaintiff has inquired when Defendants will be able to provide their 11 supplemental responses. Defendants have indicated that they are unable to provide Plaintiff with 12 KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 NORDHOFF ST. NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 10 an exact date for when supplemental responses will be provided. Defendants have indicated they 13 are diligently working to secure documents as soon as possible. Thus, the parties jointly seek an 14 extension of the case management dates in order to fully resolve the discovery issues in advance 15 of the currently set trial briefing schedule. 16 The parties request the following continuances: 17 Current Dates: 18 Discovery cut-off January 6, 2012 19 Plaintiff’s opening brief February 21, 2012 20 Defendants’ opposition/cross motion March 12, 2012 21 Plaintiff’s reply/opposition to cross motion April 3, 2012 22 Defendants’ reply brief April 24, 2012 23 Hearing on dispositive motions and further CMC May 10, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. 24 Proposed Dates: 25 Discovery cut-off February 29, 2012 26 Plaintiff’s opening brief April 3, 2012 27 Defendants’ opposition/cross motion April 24, 2012 28 Plaintiff’s reply/opposition to cross motion May 15, 2012 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES -2- CASE NO. C10-05634 CW 1 Defendants’ reply brief June 5, 2012 2 Hearing on dispositive motions and further CMC June 21, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. 3 SO STIPULATED. 4 Respectfully submitted, 5 6 Dated: January 3, 2012 7 GORDON & REES LLP By: 8 9 10 11 /s/ Joel A. Morgan Jordan S. Altura Joel A. Morgan Attorneys for Defendants AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; OFFICE DEPOT TEMPORARY DISABILITY PLAN and OFFICE DEPOT LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 NORDHOFF ST. NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: January 3, 2012 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP By: /s/ Brent Dorian Brehm Brent Dorian Brehm Corinne Chandler Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN CAMPOLO 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES -3- CASE NO. C10-05634 CW 1 2 3 ORDER Good cause appearing, and pursuant to the above Joint Stipulation Re: Extending Case Management Dates, the Court modifies the Case Management Dates as follows: 4 Current Dates: 6 Discovery cut-off January 6, 2012 7 Plaintiff’s opening brief February 21, 2012 8 Defendants’ opposition/cross motion March 12, 2012 9 Plaintiff’s reply/opposition to cross motion April 3, 2012 10 Defendants’ reply brief April 24, 2012 11 Hearing on dispositive motions and further CMC May 10, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. 12 New Dates: 13 Discovery cut-off February 29, 2012 14 Plaintiff’s opening brief April 3, 2012 15 Defendants’ opposition/cross motion April 24, 2012 16 Plaintiff’s reply/opposition to cross motion May 15, 2012 17 Defendants’ reply brief June 5, 2012 18 KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP 19839 NORDHOFF ST. NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 5 Hearing on dispositive motions and further CMC June 21, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED 20 21 22 23 January 4 DATED: ____________, 2012 _______________________________________ The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 AETNA/1067225/11423937v.1 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES -4- CASE NO. C10-05634 CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?