Campolo v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
37
ORDER Granting 36 Stipulation. Discovery due by 2/29/2012. Motions due by 4/3/2012. Cross Motions due by 4/24/2012. Responses due by 5/15/2012. Replies due by 6/5/2012. Motion Hearing set for 6/21/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken.Case Management Statement due by 6/14/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/21/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/4/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 NORDHOFF ST.
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324
12
13
14
JORDAN S. ALTURA (SBN: 209431)
jaltura@gordonrees.com
JOEL A. MORGAN (SBN: 262937)
jmorgan@gordonrees.com
GORDON & REES LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-5900
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054
Attorneys for Defendants
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY;
OFFICE DEPOT TEMPORARY
DISABILITY PLAN and OFFICE DEPOT LONG
TERM DISABILITY PLAN
CORINNE CHANDLER, ESQ. (SBN: 111423)
cchandler@kantorlaw.net
BRENT DORIAN BREHM, ESQ. (SBN: 248983)
bbrehm@kantorlaw.net
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, CA 91324
Telephone: (818) 886-2525
Facsimile: (818) 350-6272
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN CAMPOLO
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
JOHN CAMPOLO,
20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
22
23
24
25
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY;
OFFICE DEPOT TEMPORARY
DISABILITY PLAN; OFFICE DEPOT LONG
TERM DISABILITY PLAN;
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C10-05634 CW (JSCx)
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
CASE MANAGEMENT DATES
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES
CASE NO. C10-05634 CW
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff John
2
Campolo (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”), Office Depot
3
Temporary Disability Plan, and Office Depot Long Term Disability Plan (collectively the
4
“Office Depot Plan”) (“Aetna and the Office Depot Plan are collectively referred to herein as
5
“Defendants”) by and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows:
6
Plaintiff served discovery on the Defendants in March and September, 2011. Plaintiff
7
granted Defendants extensions to respond to this discovery and the parties sought an extension of
8
the discovery cut-off from December 16, 2011 until January 6, 2012. (Docket No. 27) The Court
9
granted that stipulation. (Docket No. 29)
10
Following receipt of discovery responses that Plaintiff considered to contain
inappropriate objections and insufficient responses, on November 21, 2011, the parties
12
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 NORDHOFF ST.
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324
11
conducted the LR 37-1 meet and confer. During this meet and confer, Defendants’ counsel
13
represented that supplemental responses curing many of Plaintiff’s concerns would be provided
14
by the end of the month. Defendants did not provide supplemental responses by the end of the
15
month.
16
17
18
On November 23, 2011, the Court granted the parties stipulated protective order
regarding the confidentiality of information. (Docket No. 31)
On December 7, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel. (Docket No. 32) That Motion,
19
and all further discovery motions, was referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley.
20
(Docket No. 33 & 34) On December 8, 2011, Defendants produced additional information in
21
response to the discovery. The parties again engaged in discussions regarding Plaintiff’s
22
concerns with Defendants’ supplemental responses. Defendants agreed to provide supplemental
23
responses, but following Plaintiff’s request, could not provide a date upon which those
24
supplemental responses would be produced to Plaintiff.
25
On December 14, 2011, Judge Corley held a telephonic discovery conference with the
26
parties. (Docket No. 34) Based on the parties representation that some of the sought-after
27
discovery had been produced, and that Defendants were working to provide further supplemental
28
responses (which Defendants represented had been delayed due to the holidays and a shortage of
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES
-1-
CASE NO. C10-05634 CW
1
staff), Judge Corley dismissed Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, without prejudice, and ordered the
2
parties to bring any unresolved discovery matters before the Court through a joint discovery
3
letter. (Docket No. 35)
4
During the telephonic discovery conference the issue of sufficient time to fully complete
5
discovery within the currently set discovery cut-off was discussed with Judge Corley. The parties
6
each represented their willingness to seek an extension of dates in order to work towards
7
resolving any discovery issues prior to any cut-offs.
8
9
The parties have continued to work toward resolving Plaintiff’s concerns regarding
Defendants’ discovery responses. To date, Defendants have not provided Plaintiff with further
supplemental responses. Plaintiff has inquired when Defendants will be able to provide their
11
supplemental responses. Defendants have indicated that they are unable to provide Plaintiff with
12
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 NORDHOFF ST.
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324
10
an exact date for when supplemental responses will be provided. Defendants have indicated they
13
are diligently working to secure documents as soon as possible. Thus, the parties jointly seek an
14
extension of the case management dates in order to fully resolve the discovery issues in advance
15
of the currently set trial briefing schedule.
16
The parties request the following continuances:
17
Current Dates:
18
Discovery cut-off
January 6, 2012
19
Plaintiff’s opening brief
February 21, 2012
20
Defendants’ opposition/cross motion
March 12, 2012
21
Plaintiff’s reply/opposition to cross motion
April 3, 2012
22
Defendants’ reply brief
April 24, 2012
23
Hearing on dispositive motions and further CMC
May 10, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.
24
Proposed Dates:
25
Discovery cut-off
February 29, 2012
26
Plaintiff’s opening brief
April 3, 2012
27
Defendants’ opposition/cross motion
April 24, 2012
28
Plaintiff’s reply/opposition to cross motion
May 15, 2012
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES
-2-
CASE NO. C10-05634 CW
1
Defendants’ reply brief
June 5, 2012
2
Hearing on dispositive motions and further CMC
June 21, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.
3
SO STIPULATED.
4
Respectfully submitted,
5
6
Dated: January 3, 2012
7
GORDON & REES LLP
By:
8
9
10
11
/s/ Joel A. Morgan
Jordan S. Altura
Joel A. Morgan
Attorneys for Defendants
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY; OFFICE DEPOT
TEMPORARY DISABILITY PLAN
and OFFICE DEPOT LONG
TERM DISABILITY PLAN
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 NORDHOFF ST.
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324
12
13
14
15
16
Dated: January 3, 2012
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
By:
/s/ Brent Dorian Brehm
Brent Dorian Brehm
Corinne Chandler
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN CAMPOLO
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES
-3-
CASE NO. C10-05634 CW
1
2
3
ORDER
Good cause appearing, and pursuant to the above Joint Stipulation Re: Extending Case
Management Dates, the Court modifies the Case Management Dates as follows:
4
Current Dates:
6
Discovery cut-off
January 6, 2012
7
Plaintiff’s opening brief
February 21, 2012
8
Defendants’ opposition/cross motion
March 12, 2012
9
Plaintiff’s reply/opposition to cross motion
April 3, 2012
10
Defendants’ reply brief
April 24, 2012
11
Hearing on dispositive motions and further CMC
May 10, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.
12
New Dates:
13
Discovery cut-off
February 29, 2012
14
Plaintiff’s opening brief
April 3, 2012
15
Defendants’ opposition/cross motion
April 24, 2012
16
Plaintiff’s reply/opposition to cross motion
May 15, 2012
17
Defendants’ reply brief
June 5, 2012
18
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 NORDHOFF ST.
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324
5
Hearing on dispositive motions and further CMC
June 21, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED
20
21
22
23
January 4
DATED: ____________, 2012
_______________________________________
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
AETNA/1067225/11423937v.1
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING CASE MANAGEMENT DATES
-4-
CASE NO. C10-05634 CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?