Kellogg v. State of California

Filing 9

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/10/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2011)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 DENNIS E. KELLOGG, 4 5 6 No. C 10-05802 SBA (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 7 / 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner, filed the present pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. After being released from prison on January 17, 2011, he had informed the Court that his new address was 3500 Data Drive, #233, Rancho Cordova, California 95670. (Pl.'s Letter dated Jan. 20, 2011 at 1.) However, on March 7, 2011, mail directed to Plaintiff at that address was returned to the Clerk of the Court with the notation "ATTEMPTED, NOT KNOWN." It appears that delivery was attempted, but Plaintiff was not known at that address. To date, Plaintiff has not updated his address with the Court or submitted any further pleadings in this case. Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11 a party proceeding pro se whose address changes while an action is pending must promptly file a notice of change of address specifying the new address. See L.R. 3-11(a). The court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint when: (1) mail directed to the pro se party by the court has been returned to the court as not deliverable, and (2) the court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from the pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b). More than sixty days have passed since the mail directed to Plaintiff by the Court was returned as not deliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff of a new address. Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the Northern District Local Rules. The Court has rendered its final decision on this matter, therefore, this Order TERMINATES Plaintiff's case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 5/10/11 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge G:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.10\Kellogg5802.Diss-3-11.wpd 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 DENNIS E KELLOGG, Case Number: CV10-05802 SBA 8 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al, Defendant. / 12 13 14 15 16 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on May 13, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 17 18 20 Dennis E. Kellogg 3500 Data Dr. #233 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 21 Dated: May 13, 2011 19 22 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.10\Kellogg5802.Diss-3-11.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?