Wehlage v. EmpRes Healthcare Inc et al
Filing
38
ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH; CIVIL L.R. 6-2, 7-12. Motion Hearing set for 7/14/2011 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Case Management Statement due by 7/7/2011. Case Management Conference set for 7/14/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/28/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP BARRY S. LANDSBERG (Bar No. CA 117284) E-mail: blandsberg@manatt.com BRAD W. SEILING (Bar No. CA 143515) E-mail: bseiling@manatt.com ANDREW H. STRUVE (Bar No. CA 200803) E-mail: astruve@manatt.com JESSICA J. SLUSSER (Bar No. CA 217307) E-mail: jslusser@manatt.com JUSTIN C. JOHNSON (Bar No. CA 252175) E-mail: jjohnson@manatt.com 11355 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90064-1614 Telephone: (310) 312-4000 Facsimile: (310) 312-4224 DAVID L. SHAPIRO (Pro Hac Vice) E-mail: dshapiro@law.harvard.edu 1563 Mass. Ave. Cambridge, MA 02138 Telephone: (617) 495-4618 Facsimile: (617) 495-1950 Attorneys for Defendants EmpRes Healthcare, Inc., EHC Financial Services, L.L.C. , Evergreen California Healthcare, L.L.C., Evergreen California Healthcare L.L.C.; Evergreen at Arvin L.L.C.; Evergreen at Bakersfield L.L.C.; Evergreen at Heartwood L.L.C.; Evergreen at Springs Road L.L.C.; Evergreen at Tracy L.L.C.; Evergreen at Oroville L.L.C.; Evergreen at Petaluma L.L.C.; Evergreen at Gridley (SNF) L.L.C. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Phyllis Wehlage, on her behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. EmpRes Healthcare, Inc.; EHC Management LLC; EHC Financial Services LLC; Evergreen California Healthcare LLC; Evergreen at Arvin LLC; Evergreen at Bakersfield LLC; Evergreen at Lakeport LLC; Evergreen at Heartwood LLC; Evergreen at Springs Road LLC; Evergreen at Tracy LLC; Evergreen at Oroville LLC; Evergreen at No. C 10-05839 CW ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH; CIVIL L.R. 6-2, 7-12 Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken
[PROPOSED] ORDER: EMPRES HEALTHCARE ET AL.'S 12(b)(6) MTD (CASE NO. C 10-05839 CW)
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES
Petaluma LLC; Evergreen at Gridley (SNF) LLC; and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, Defendants.
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER: EMPRES HEALTHCARE ET AL.'S 12(b)(6) MTD (CASE NO. C 10-05839 CW)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, 1. The Case Management Conference currently set for April 12, 2011, at 2:00 p.m. shall be continued to July 14, 2011 at 2:00 PM. 2. The hearing on Defendants EmpRes Healthcare, Inc., EHC Financial Services, L.L.C. and Evergreen California Healthcare, L.L.C. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for lack of in personam jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall be continued to July 14, 2011 at 2:00 PM. All
moving, opposing and reply papers shall be filed and served according to the Local Rules. 3. Defendants' motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall remain on calendar on April 7, 2011. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
3/28/2011 Dated: __________________
_____________________________________
Hon. Claudia Wilken United States District Judge
Respectfully Submitted, MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS
By: /s/ Brad Seiling Brad W. Seiling Attorneys for Defendants EMPRES HEALTHCARE, INC., et al. Dated: March 23, 2011
300229095.1
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER: EMPRES HEALTHCARE ET AL.'S 12(b)(6) MTD (CASE NO. C 10-05839 CW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?