Burden v. Selectquote Insurance Services

Filing 91

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to Motion Hearing set for 2/12/2013 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 12/20/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Gregory N. Karasik (SBN 115834)
[e-mail]
Karasik Law Firm
11835 W. Olympic Blvd. Ste. 1275
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Ira Spiro (SBN 67641)
[e-mail]
Spiro Moore LLP
11377 W. Olympic Boulevard, 5th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90064-1683
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Alexander I. Dychter (SBN 234526)
[e-mail]
Dychter Law Offices, APC
1010 Second Ave., Suite 1835
San Diego, California 92101
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHARLES BURDEN

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

OAKLAND DIVISION

17

CHARLES BURDEN, individually and on
behalf of other persons similarly situated,

18

Plaintiffs,

19
20
21

vs.
SELECTQUOTE INSURANCE SERVICES,
a California Corporation; and DOES 1
through 10.

22

Case No. CV 10-5966 SBA (DMR)
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF
DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS
ACTION SETTLEMENT AND ORDER
THEREON

Defendants.

23
24

Plaintiff Charles Burden (“Plaintiff”) and defendant SelectQuote Insurance Services

25

(“Defendant”) hereby enter into this Stipulation re Extension of Deadline for Filing Motion for

26

Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and mutually request the Court to enter an order

27

thereon.

28

1
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR FILING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

STIPULATION
1.

On October 9, 2012, at a Mandatory Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge

3

Ryu, the parties reached agreement on the material terms of a class action settlement (the

4

“Settlement”).

5
6
7

2.

Pursuant to the Court’s order dated October 18, 2012, Plaintiff is required to file a

motion for preliminary approval of the Settlement by December 18, 2012.
3.

Despite their diligent efforts, the parties have not yet finalized formal settlement

8

documents due to unanticipated issues that arose during the drafting process. The parties have

9

resolved those issues and expect a formal settlement to be executed within the next few days.

10

4.

The parties mutually request that the deadline for Plaintiff to file his motion for

11

preliminary approval, which Plaintiff intends to notice for hearing on February 12, 2013, be extended

12

to December 24, 2012

13

Dated: December 18, 2012

KARASIK LAW FIRM

14
By:

15

/s/ Gregory N. Karasik
Gregory N. Karasik
Attorneys for Plaintiff

16
17

Dated: December 18, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

18
By:

19

/s/ Karen J. Kubin
Karen J. Kubin
Attorneys for Defendant

20

ORDER

21
22
23

Good cause having been shown, the deadline for Plaintiff to file his motion for preliminary
approval of the parties’ class action settlement is hereby extended to December 24, 2012.

24
25

Dated: _12/20/12

_______________________________
United States District Judge

26
27
28

2
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR FILING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER