McClellan et al v. SFN Group, Inc. et al
Filing
49
ORDER re 48 Proposed Order filed by Laura Loveless, Kimberly McClellan. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/9/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6 KIMBERLY MCCLELLAN and
LAURA LOVELESS, individually and
7 on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
v.
Case No. C10-05972 SBA
ORDER AMENDING ORDER
GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT OF
SUBCLASS AND DISMISSAL OF
CLASS ALLEGATIONS
10 SFN GROUP, INC., SFN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC,
11 and SPHERION ATLANTIC
ENTERPRISES, LLC, all doing
12 business as SPHERION, and
SPHERION, a business form unknown,
13 and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING ORDER GRANTING
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
1
On June 14, 2012, the Court entered its Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for
2 Preliminary Approval, which was filed on June 21, 2012. That Order is amended as
3 follows:
4
1.
The Notice of Pendency of Class Action (“Notice”), filed with the
5 Court on June 26, 2012 and containing revisions to the proposed Notice of Pendency
6 of Class Action filed with Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval, complies
7 with the Court’s requirements for such notice as set forth in the Order Granting
8 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval (Dkt. 46), and constitutes sufficient and
9 proper notice to the class; and
10
2.
The Notice shall be sent out by the Class Administrator within 20 days
11 of the date of this Order.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
16
Dated: 7/9/12
By
The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong
Judge, U.S. States District Court
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING ORDER GRANTING
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?