McClellan et al v. SFN Group, Inc. et al

Filing 49

ORDER re 48 Proposed Order filed by Laura Loveless, Kimberly McClellan. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/9/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 OAKLAND DIVISION 5 6 KIMBERLY MCCLELLAN and LAURA LOVELESS, individually and 7 on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 8 9 v. Case No. C10-05972 SBA ORDER AMENDING ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT OF SUBCLASS AND DISMISSAL OF CLASS ALLEGATIONS 10 SFN GROUP, INC., SFN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC, 11 and SPHERION ATLANTIC ENTERPRISES, LLC, all doing 12 business as SPHERION, and SPHERION, a business form unknown, 13 and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 1 On June 14, 2012, the Court entered its Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for 2 Preliminary Approval, which was filed on June 21, 2012. That Order is amended as 3 follows: 4 1. The Notice of Pendency of Class Action (“Notice”), filed with the 5 Court on June 26, 2012 and containing revisions to the proposed Notice of Pendency 6 of Class Action filed with Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval, complies 7 with the Court’s requirements for such notice as set forth in the Order Granting 8 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval (Dkt. 46), and constitutes sufficient and 9 proper notice to the class; and 10 2. The Notice shall be sent out by the Class Administrator within 20 days 11 of the date of this Order. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 16 Dated: 7/9/12 By The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong Judge, U.S. States District Court 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?