Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Care Trust of Northern California et al v. Total Air Balance Company, Inc.

Filing 30

ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND CALCULATION OF INTEREST. Signed by Judge Beeler on 11/16/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 Oakland Division BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al., 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 Plaintiffs, v. 13 TOTAL AIR BALANCE, INC., No. C 11-0030 LB ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND CALCULATION OF INTEREST 14 15 16 Defendant. _____________________________________ In the above-captioned matter, Plaintiffs filed a motion for default judgment, which is noticed for 17 December 1, 2011. ECF No. 21 at 1. To reduce costs, the court invites Plaintiffs to appear by 18 telephone. If Plaintiffs wish to appear by telephone, they shall coordinate the telephonic appearance 19 with courtroom deputy Lashanda Scott who can be reached at 51-637-3525. 20 After its initial review of Plaintiffs’ motion, the court has identified only one remaining issue. 21 Plaintiffs request $9,504.11 in accrued interest. Maraia Decl., ECF No. 23 at 5, ¶ 17. In checking 22 Plaintiffs’ calculations, the court’s calculations for interest due on the June 2011 contributions came 23 to $249.96 less than the $941.58 sought by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs should be prepared to explain their 24 interest calculations for this period at the hearing or they may submit a written explanation in 25 advance. Plaintiffs also shall serve this order on Total Air Balance by mail. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: November 16, 2011 28 C 11-0030 LB ORDER REGARDING HEARING AND CALCULATION OF INTEREST ________________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?