Deane v. Fastenal Company

Filing 142

ORDER ENTERING TENTATIVE RULING ON MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND JUDGMENT AS ORDER OF THE COURT by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying without prejudice 138 Joint Motion. Renewed Joint Motion for Settlement Approval and Judgmentto be submitted by 11/26/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 KRISTOPHER DEANE, MICHAEL ROMANO, AND LISA JOHNSON, Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 Case No.: 11-CV-42 ORDER ENTERING TENTATIVE RULING ON MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND JUDGMENT AS ORDER OF COURT vs. FASTENAL COMPANY, Defendant. 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court’s Tentative Ruling Denying Without Prejudice Motion for Settlement Approval and Judgment, Dkt. No. 139, shall be the Order of the Court. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth therein, the Motion for Settlement Approval and Judgment, Dkt. No. 138, is DENIED Without Prejudice. The parties will submit a renewed Joint Motion for Settlement Approval and Judgment on or before November 26, 2013 The Court will set a hearing date on the motion as necessary upon review of the revised submission. This Order Terminates Docket Number 139. IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: November 21, 2013 __________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?