Via Technologies, Inc. et al v. Vizio, Inc.

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR COMPLETION OF MEDIATION re 25 Stipulation filed by Vizio, Inc., Via Technologies Inc., Via Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/25/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)

Download PDF
1 DAVID N. MAKOUS, SB# 082409 E-Mail: makous@lbbslaw.com 2 JOSHUA S. HODAS, SB# 250802 E-Mail: jhodas@lbbslaw.com 3 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 1200 4 Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: 213.250.1800 5 Facsimile: 213.250.7900 6 Attorneys for Vizio, Inc., a California Corporation 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 10 11 VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a California corporation, and VIA TECHNOLOGIES, 12 INC., a Taiwan corporation, Honorable Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton Plaintiffs, 13 14 CASE NO. CV11-0077 PJH v. 15 VIZIO, INC., a Delaware corporation, 16 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR COMPLETION OF MEDIATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendant. 17 18 Complaint Filed: January 7, 2011 19 Trial Date: October 29, 2012 20 21 22 Whereas, the Court referred this case for court mediation on July 5, 2011 and 23 subsequently, on joint stipulated motion of the parties, referred it to private mediation on July 24 11, 2011; and 25 Whereas, Local Rule ADR 37 requires that mediation be held within 90 days of referral 26 to a mediator; and 27 LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4830-6398-6956.1 CV11-0077 PJH JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING DATE FOR COMPLETION OF MEDIATION 1 Whereas the parties held a private mediation before Hon. Daniel Weinstein (ret.) of 2 JAMS on September 28, 2011; and 3 Whereas, at that mediation an agreement in principal was achieved on the terms of 4 settlement of this case, several draft settlement agreements have since been circulated among 5 the parties, and the parties believe that a final settlement will be achieved soon; 6 The parties hereby respectfully request that any deadline to complete mediation be 7 extended until November 15, 2011 in order to allow time for a final agreement to be 8 completed. 9 10 DATED: October 19, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 11 12 DAVID N. MAKOUS JOSHUA S. HODAS LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 13 By: 14 15 DATED: October 19, 2011 16 17 /s/ Joshua S. Hodas Joshua S. Hodas Attorneys for VIZIO, INC., a Delaware Corporation J. DAVID HADDEN JEDEDIAH WAKEFILED TYLER G. NEWBY SEBASTIAN KAPLAN FENWICK & WEST LLP 18 By: /s/ Jedediah Wakefiekd (by permission) Jedediah Wakefield Attorneys for Plaintiffs VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Taiwan) and VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (California) 19 20 21 [Proposed] ORDER 22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. R NIA FO H ATTORNEYS AT LAW ER LI RT 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP D E Honorable Phyllis RE Hamilton O ORD J. IT IS S United States District Court Judge n NorthernJudge Phyllis J. HamilCalifornia District of to NO 27 LEWIS UNIT ED 26 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 10/25/11 25 Dated: ______________ S 24 4830-6398-6956.1 A 23 N F D IS T IC T O R C CV11-0077 PJH 2 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING DATE FOR COMPLETION OF MEDIATION ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 1 2 3 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I, Joshua S. 4 Hodas, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each 5 of the other signatories to this document. 6 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 7 that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 19th day of October, 2011 at Los 8 Angeles, California. 9 By: 10 /s/ Joshua S. Hodas Joshua S. Hodas 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4830-6398-6956.1 CV11-0077 PJH 3 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING DATE FOR COMPLETION OF MEDIATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?