Haefner v. Berlin
Filing
28
ORDER Re Service of Supplemental Information in Support of Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 06/06/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
SCOTT HAEFNER,
12
13
Plaintiff(s),
v.
14
ORDER RE SERVICE OF
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT
GLORIA RHOADS BERLIN,
15
No. C-11-00112 DMR
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
16
17
On April 25, 2011, this Court issued an Order Regarding Supplemental Information On
18
Motion for Default Judgment and Continuing Hearing Date. See Docket No. 17. The Court ordered
19
Plaintiff to submit supplemental information in support of the motion, and at the same time Plaintiff
20
submitted the information to the Court, to serve the supplemental information on Defendant Gloria
21
Rhoads Berlin and to e-file a proof of service on the same day that service was effected.
22
The Court notes that Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order to file a proof of
23
service of the supplemental information (Docket Nos. 21-23) with the Court. Plaintiff is therefore
24
ordered to immediately comply with the Court’s previous order and e-file a proof of service.
25
If Plaintiff has not yet served the supplemental information on Defendant, Plaintiff is ordered
26
to serve Docket Nos. 21-23 on Defendant by Express Mail no later than June 6, 2011 and to e-
27
file a proof of service on the same day that service is effected.
28
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: June 6, 2011
4
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?