Reed et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
Filing
111
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 109 Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)
1 Ralph A. Kerstetter (S.B. #88525)
KERSTETTER LAW GROUP
2 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3850
San Francisco, CA 94104
3 Phone (415) 462-1966
Fax (866) 259-6762
4
5 Attorney for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
WELLS FARGO BANK, a national
banking association; NDEX WEST, LLC; )
a limited liability company; and DOES 1 to )
10,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., an
10 individual; and IRMA M. REED, an
individual
11
Plaintiffs,
12
vs.
Case No. C 11-00194 DMR
13
Hearing date: TBD
14
15
16
APPLICATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER]
FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD
LITEM
Hearing time: TBD
Judge Donna M. Ryu
Courtroom 11
17
TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD IN THIS ACTION:
18
1. The undersigned IRMA M. REED, the spouse of plaintiff BENJAMIN F. REED,
19 SR., hereby applies to the Court to be appointed his guardian ad litem in this action.
20
2. BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., is an incompetent person, having suffered a severely
21 debilitating stroke, and is unable to handle his affairs.
22
3. This lawsuit is entirely related to a dispute with the named defendants over marital
23 community property owned by Plaintiff BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., and me. Under
24 California law I am the sole competent person with the power to manage and control such
25 community property, and have been prosecuting this lawsuit on behalf of us both. I will
26 continue to do so with the goal of maximizing the benefit to our marital community estate,
27 and to each of us. I am the person who is the primary caretaker of my husband, BENJAMIN
KERSTETTER LAW GROUP
28
-1–
44 Montgomery Street, Suite
3850
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone (415) 462-1966
APPLICATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] FOR
APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
1 M. REED, SR., and am acting to preserve our family home where he resides.
2
4. I am fully competent and qualified to understand and protect the rights of my
3 husband, BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., and because the action relates solely to marital
4 community assets over which I have sole legal control and authority, and my intent and
5 desire to prosecute this action for the maximum benefit of the marital community estate, and
6 to provide a stable home to my husband, I have no adverse interests to my husband.
7
5. I consent to my appointment as the guardian ad litem of plaintiff BENJAMIN F.
8 REED, SR. in this action.
9
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
10 foregoing is true and correct.
11
Executed this 6th day of March 2013 at San Francisco, California.
12
13
/s/ Irma M. Reed
14 _
Irma M. Reed
15
16
Respectfully submitted,
17
18 DATED: March 6, 2013 /s/ Ralph A. Kerstetter
___________________________________
19
Ralph A. Kerstetter
KERSTETTER LAW GROUP
counsel for Plaintiffs
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
KERSTETTER LAW GROUP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite
3850
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone (415) 462-1966
-2–
APPLICATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] FOR
APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
1
2 ORDER;
3 The Court finds that it is reasonable and necessary to appoint a guardian ad litem for
4 plaintiff BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., in this action, as requested in this application. The
5 Court orders that IRMA M. REED is hereby appointed as the guardian ad litem for
6 plaintiff BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., for this action.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
RT
U
O
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
7
Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu yu
M. R
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FO
A
N
14
KERSTETTER LAW GROUP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite
3850
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone (415) 462-1966
LI
ER
H
13
RT
12
onna
Judge D
R NIA
11
NO
27
10 March___, 2013
D
RDERE
S SO O
IT I
__________________________________
9
-3–
APPLICATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] FOR
APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?