Reed et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al

Filing 111

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 109 Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)

Download PDF
1 Ralph A. Kerstetter (S.B. #88525) KERSTETTER LAW GROUP 2 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3850 San Francisco, CA 94104 3 Phone (415) 462-1966 Fax (866) 259-6762 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WELLS FARGO BANK, a national banking association; NDEX WEST, LLC; ) a limited liability company; and DOES 1 to ) 10, ) ) ) Defendants. ) BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., an 10 individual; and IRMA M. REED, an individual 11 Plaintiffs, 12 vs. Case No. C 11-00194 DMR 13 Hearing date: TBD 14 15 16 APPLICATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM Hearing time: TBD Judge Donna M. Ryu Courtroom 11 17 TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD IN THIS ACTION: 18 1. The undersigned IRMA M. REED, the spouse of plaintiff BENJAMIN F. REED, 19 SR., hereby applies to the Court to be appointed his guardian ad litem in this action. 20 2. BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., is an incompetent person, having suffered a severely 21 debilitating stroke, and is unable to handle his affairs. 22 3. This lawsuit is entirely related to a dispute with the named defendants over marital 23 community property owned by Plaintiff BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., and me. Under 24 California law I am the sole competent person with the power to manage and control such 25 community property, and have been prosecuting this lawsuit on behalf of us both. I will 26 continue to do so with the goal of maximizing the benefit to our marital community estate, 27 and to each of us. I am the person who is the primary caretaker of my husband, BENJAMIN KERSTETTER LAW GROUP 28 -1– 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3850 San Francisco, CA 94104 Phone (415) 462-1966 APPLICATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM 1 M. REED, SR., and am acting to preserve our family home where he resides. 2 4. I am fully competent and qualified to understand and protect the rights of my 3 husband, BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., and because the action relates solely to marital 4 community assets over which I have sole legal control and authority, and my intent and 5 desire to prosecute this action for the maximum benefit of the marital community estate, and 6 to provide a stable home to my husband, I have no adverse interests to my husband. 7 5. I consent to my appointment as the guardian ad litem of plaintiff BENJAMIN F. 8 REED, SR. in this action. 9 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 10 foregoing is true and correct. 11 Executed this 6th day of March 2013 at San Francisco, California. 12 13 /s/ Irma M. Reed 14 _ Irma M. Reed 15 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 DATED: March 6, 2013 /s/ Ralph A. Kerstetter ___________________________________ 19 Ralph A. Kerstetter KERSTETTER LAW GROUP counsel for Plaintiffs 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KERSTETTER LAW GROUP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3850 San Francisco, CA 94104 Phone (415) 462-1966 -2– APPLICATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM 1 2 ORDER; 3 The Court finds that it is reasonable and necessary to appoint a guardian ad litem for 4 plaintiff BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., in this action, as requested in this application. The 5 Court orders that IRMA M. REED is hereby appointed as the guardian ad litem for 6 plaintiff BENJAMIN F. REED, SR., for this action. S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED RT U O 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. S 7 Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu yu M. R 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FO A N 14 KERSTETTER LAW GROUP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3850 San Francisco, CA 94104 Phone (415) 462-1966 LI ER H 13 RT 12 onna Judge D R NIA 11 NO 27 10 March___, 2013 D RDERE S SO O IT I __________________________________ 9 -3– APPLICATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?