Abels v. Bank of America et al

Filing 100

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO INTERVENE AND TO EXPUNGE; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Court VACATES the hearing on motions set for 8/21/2012. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 8/24/2012 09:01 AM. Show Cause Response due by 8/21/2012.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/9/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2012) Modified on 8/10/2012 (fs, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 ALISON M. ABELS, 6 Plaintiff, 7 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO INTERVENE AND TO EXPUNGE; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE vs. 8 9 Case No.: 11-CV-208 YGR BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., Defendants. 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 Third Party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Harborview 12 Mortgage Loan Trust Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-12 (“Wells Fargo”), 13 has filed its Motions to Intervene (Dkt. No. 93) and to Expunge Lis Pendens (Dkt. No. 95). Wells 14 Fargo argues that it should be permitted to intervene and to expunge the lis pendens because it has a 15 current interest in the subject property as the assignee of the deed of trust previously held by 16 Defendant Bank of America, N.A. Wells Fargo states that the assignment was recorded March 7, 17 2012. 18 Plaintiff Alison M. Abels (“Abels”) has filed a response to the motion indicating that Wells 19 Fargo no longer has an interest in the property since it was sold in foreclosure proceedings on June 20 25, 2012 to third party “Last Mile, LLC,” and that a Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale was recorded on July 21 7, 2012. That sale would appear to have extinguished any interest Wells Fargo may have had. Wells 22 Fargo, for its part, did not file a reply as to either motion. 23 The Court hereby VACATES the hearing on the motions set for August 21, 2012. 24 Wells Fargo is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on Friday, August 24, 2012, on the Court’s 25 9:01a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, why these 26 motions should not be denied for failure to demonstrate a current interest in the property. Wells 27 Fargo is directed to file a written response providing evidence of a current interest in the property no 28 1 later than August 21, 2012. If the a written response has been filed, or if the motions have been 2 withdrawn, Wells Fargo need not appear and the hearing on the Order to Show Cause will be taken 3 off calendar. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: August 9, 2012 6 7 8 ___________________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?