DeFrancesco et al v. Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant et al

Filing 54

ORDER denying as moot the joint request to continue the Case Management Conference re 53 Proposed Order, filed by Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant, Morgan Stanley, Simon Wong, Craftworks Restaurants and Breweries, Inc., Scott Pope, Sebastian DeFrancesco, PPF Off 345 Spear Street, LP. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/7/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2012)

Download PDF
Paul L. Rein, Esq. (SBN 43053) 1 Celia McGuinness, Esq. (SBN 159420) Catherine M. Cabalo, Esq. (SBN 248198) 2 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A 3 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 832-5001 4 Facsimile: (510) 832-4787 E-mail: reinlawoffice@aol.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 SEBASTIAN DEFRANCESCO, SCOTT POPE, and SIMON WONG 7 *Counsel for Defendants Appear after Caption Page 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEBASTIAN DEFRANCESCO, SCOTT POPE, 12 and SIMON WONG, Civil Rights 13 14 Plaintiffs, v. 15 16 GORDON BIERSCH BREWERY RESTAURANT; CRAFTWORKS 17 RESTAURANTS AND BREWERIES, INC.; 18 PPF OFF 345 SPEAR STREET, LP; MORGAN STANLEY; AND DOES 1-10, 19 Inclusive, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 4:11-cv-00224 YGR Defendants. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE LORBER, GREENFIELD & POLITO, LLP 1 Lisa M. Cappelluti, Esq., SBN 176568 Sheryl Traum, Esq., SBN 139328 2 150 Post Street, Suite 700 3 San Francisco, California 94108 TEL: (415) 986-0688 / FAX: (415) 986-1172 4 straum@lorberlaw.com 5 Attorneys for Defendants PPF OFF 345 SPEAR STREET, LP 6 and MORGAN STANLEY 7 Margi C. Bell (SBN 156879) Michael J. O’Connor, Jr. (SBN 202734) 8 ANDREWS LAGASSE BRANCH & BELL LLP 11232 El Camino Real, Suite 250 9 San Diego, CA 92130 Tel: (858) 345-5071 10 Fax: (858) 345-5072 moconnor@albblaw.com 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 GORDON BIERSCH BREWERY RESTAURANT and CRAFTWORKS RESTAURANTS AND BREWERIES, INC. 13 To this Honorable Court: 14 15 The parties, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby jointly stipulate to continue 16 the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for June 11, 2012, to any date convenient 17 18 for the Court and Counsel after June 13, 2012. Good cause exists for this continuance because the sole remaining issue in this case is plaintiffs’ receipt of payment for their damages and attorney fees, due on June 13, 2012, pursuant to the Court Enforceable Settlement Agreement. Defendants 19 have prepared a dismissal and plaintiffs’ counsel will sign it for filing with the Court once payment 20 has been received by plaintiffs. 21 22 Dated: June 6, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 23 24 25 26 ___/s/ Paul L. Rein________________ By: Paul L. Rein, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff SEBASTIAN DEFRANCSECO, SCOTT POPE, and SIMON WONG 27 28 2 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue CMC 1 Dated: June 7, 2012 2 LORBER, GREENFIELD & POLITO, LLP Lisa M. Cappelluti, Esq. Lisa G. Schlittner 3 4 ___/s/ Lisa G Schlitner________________ By: Attorneys for Defendants PPF OFF 345 SPEAR STREET, LP and MORGAN STANLEY 5 6 7 8 Dated: June 6, 2012 9 ANDREWS, LAGASSE, BRANCH & BELL, LLP Michael J. O’Connor, Jr., Esq. 10 11 __/s/ Michael O’conner________________ By: Attorneys for Defendants GORDON BIERSCH BREWERY RESTAURANT; CRAFTWORKS RESTAURANTS AND BREWERIES, INC. 12 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 The stipulation and joint request to continue the Case Management Conference is DENIED AS MOOT. The case has been administratively closed in light of the Consent Decree and Settlement Agreement. (Dkt. Nos. 51 & 52.) All dates have been taken off calendar. If the parties need the Court’s assistance resolving issues regarding the Consent Decree or Settlement Agreement, they shall so inform the Court. Dated: June 7, 2012 __________________________________ Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue CMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?