Brock v. County of Napa

Filing 54

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 5/11/2012.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/7/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Gregory G. Spaulding, Esq. (SBN 106606)
Terry S. Sterling, Esq. (SBN 106379)
SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP
90 South E Street, Suite 200
P.O. Box 1867
Santa Rosa, CA 95402
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF NAPA

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

GAYLE BROCK,
Plaintiff,

11

STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY
PAPERS

vs.

12
13

Case No.: CV 11-0257 SBA

COUNTY OF NAPA and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,

Date: June 5, 2012
Time: 1:00 pm
Ctrm: 1, 4th Floor
Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong

14
Defendants.
15

PreTrial Conference: July 10, 2012
Trial Date: July 16, 2012

16
17
18
19

Plaintiff GAYLE BROCK and defendant COUNTY OF NAPA ("County") hereby enter into
this Stipulation Extending Time To File Reply Papers with reference to the following facts:

20

On April 17, 2012, the County filed its Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative,

21

Partial Summary Judgment ("Motion for Summary Judgment"). The Motion for Summary Judgment

22

was originally set for hearing on May 22, 2012, but on April 18, 2012, the Court continued the

23

hearing date on the Motion for Summary Judgment to June 5, 2012. The Court did not change the

24

dates for opposition or reply papers. On May 1, 2012, plaintiff filed her Opposition to the Motion for

25

Summary Judgment based on the briefing schedule mandated by the original May 22, 2012 hearing

26

date.

27

The deadline for filing reply papers based on the original briefing schedule is May 8, 2012. In

28

order to properly address the numerous legal and factual issues raised by the two motions, the County
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY PAPERS

Case No. CV 11-0257 SBA

1

requires additional time to file its reply papers. In light of the continuance of the hearing date for the

2

Motion for Summary Judgment, the requested extension of the deadline for filing reply papers will

3

not unduly limit the time available for the Court to prepare for the hearing on the Motion.

4

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff GAYLE BROCK and defendant

5

COUNTY OF NAPA, through their attorneys of record, that the deadline for reply papers to be filed

6

in connection with the Motion for Summary Judgment shall be continued to May 11, 2012.

7

DATED: May 4, 2012

8

SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF NAPA

9
10

By:

/s/ Terry S. Sterling
Terry S. Sterling

11
12

DATED: May 4, 2012

LAW OFFICE OF JESSE S. TURNER
Attorneys for Plaintiff GAYLE BROCK

13
14
By:
15

/s/ Jesse S. Turner
Jesse S. Turner, Esq.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY PAPERS

Case No. CV 11-0257 SBA

1
2

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

DATED: 5/7/12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY PAPERS

Case No. CV 11-0257 SBA