Algee v. Nordstrom, Inc.
Filing
18
ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 6/21/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/24/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
MICHELLE B. HEVERLY, Bar No. 178660
TOMOMI GLOVER, Bar No. 244886
LITTLER MENDELSON
A Professional Corporation
50 W. San Fernando
15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
Telephone:
408.998.4150
Fax No.:
408.288.5686
Attorneys for Defendant
NORDSTROM, INC.
MATTHEW R. BAINER, Bar No. 220972
HANNAH R. SALASSI, Bar No. 230117
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
1970 Broadway, 9th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 891-9800
Fax No.: (510) 891-7030
Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiff and the
Plaintiff’s Class
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
BRIAN ALGEE, individually, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
Case No. C 11-0301 –CW
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
v.
NORDSTROM, INC., and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendant.
Plaintiff Brian Algee and Defendant Nordstrom, Inc. (hereinafter collectively “the Parties),
by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to the following:
WHEREAS, an Initial Scheduling Conference in the above entitled action is currently
scheduled for May 24, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2;
CASE NO. C 11-0301 -CW
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONF.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and have filed a Joint Scheduling
Conference Statement as required by the FRCP and Local Rules;
WHEREAS, lead trial counsel for Defendant, Michelle B. Heverly, underwent a surgical
procedure on May 23, 2011 at the Stanford Cancer Center in Palo Alto California;
WHEREAS, pursuant to her post-operative instructions, Ms. Heverly is unable to drive or
otherwise resume her normal activities until May 31, 2011;
WHEREAS, Mr. Bainer is unavailable June 1 through 3, 2011 or the afternoons of June 8
or 9, 2011;
9
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred on this issue and have agreed that the Initial
10
Scheduling Conference should be continued to allow Ms. Heverly’s participation, as required by the
11
Northern District Local Rules;
12
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Initial Scheduling
13
Conference currently set for May 24, 2011 be vacated and that a new Initial Scheduling Conference
14
be set on the Court’s the next available date on or after June 6, 2011, excluding the afternoons of
15
June 8 or 9, 2011.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17
Dated: May 23, 2011
18
/s/ Tomomi Glover
MICHELLE B. HEVERLY
TOMOMI GLOVER
LITTLER MENDELSON
A Professional Corporation
Attorneys for Defendant
NORDSTROM, INC.
19
20
21
22
23
Dated: May 23, 2011
/s/ Matthew R. Bainer
MATTHEW R. BAINER
HANNAH R. SALASSI
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiff and
the Plaintiff’s Class
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
CASE NO. C 11-0301 –CW
2.
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONF.
1
2
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the stipulation between the Parties, the Initial
3
Scheduling conference set for May 24, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. be vacated, and that a new Initial
4
Scheduling Conference be set for Tuesday, June 21, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.
5
6
7
5/24/2011
Dated: ______________________
8
HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN
US DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
Firmwide:101859055.1 058713.1030
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113.2303
408.998.4150
CASE NO. C 11-0301 –CW
3.
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONF.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?