Algee v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Filing 18

ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 6/21/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/24/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 MICHELLE B. HEVERLY, Bar No. 178660 TOMOMI GLOVER, Bar No. 244886 LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation 50 W. San Fernando 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 Telephone: 408.998.4150 Fax No.: 408.288.5686 Attorneys for Defendant NORDSTROM, INC. MATTHEW R. BAINER, Bar No. 220972 HANNAH R. SALASSI, Bar No. 230117 SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC 1970 Broadway, 9th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 891-9800 Fax No.: (510) 891-7030 Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s Class 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 BRIAN ALGEE, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 408.998.4150 Case No. C 11-0301 –CW JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE v. NORDSTROM, INC., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant. Plaintiff Brian Algee and Defendant Nordstrom, Inc. (hereinafter collectively “the Parties), by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to the following: WHEREAS, an Initial Scheduling Conference in the above entitled action is currently scheduled for May 24, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2; CASE NO. C 11-0301 -CW JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONF. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and have filed a Joint Scheduling Conference Statement as required by the FRCP and Local Rules; WHEREAS, lead trial counsel for Defendant, Michelle B. Heverly, underwent a surgical procedure on May 23, 2011 at the Stanford Cancer Center in Palo Alto California; WHEREAS, pursuant to her post-operative instructions, Ms. Heverly is unable to drive or otherwise resume her normal activities until May 31, 2011; WHEREAS, Mr. Bainer is unavailable June 1 through 3, 2011 or the afternoons of June 8 or 9, 2011; 9 WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred on this issue and have agreed that the Initial 10 Scheduling Conference should be continued to allow Ms. Heverly’s participation, as required by the 11 Northern District Local Rules; 12 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Initial Scheduling 13 Conference currently set for May 24, 2011 be vacated and that a new Initial Scheduling Conference 14 be set on the Court’s the next available date on or after June 6, 2011, excluding the afternoons of 15 June 8 or 9, 2011. 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 Dated: May 23, 2011 18 /s/ Tomomi Glover MICHELLE B. HEVERLY TOMOMI GLOVER LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation Attorneys for Defendant NORDSTROM, INC. 19 20 21 22 23 Dated: May 23, 2011 /s/ Matthew R. Bainer MATTHEW R. BAINER HANNAH R. SALASSI SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s Class 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 408.998.4150 CASE NO. C 11-0301 –CW 2. JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONF. 1 2 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the stipulation between the Parties, the Initial 3 Scheduling conference set for May 24, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. be vacated, and that a new Initial 4 Scheduling Conference be set for Tuesday, June 21, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. 5 6 7 5/24/2011 Dated: ______________________ 8 HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN US DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 Firmwide:101859055.1 058713.1030 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 408.998.4150 CASE NO. C 11-0301 –CW 3. JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONF.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?