Patino v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al
Filing
33
ORDER Granting 32 Stipulation Regarding Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Remand Hearing Dates. Case Management Statement due by 7/7/2011. Case Management Conference set for 7/14/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/12/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2011)
1 STEVEN A. ELLIS (SBN 171742)
sellis@goodwinprocter.com
2 ALISON M. NORRIS (SBN 248711)
anorris@goodwinprocter.com
3 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
601 S. Figueroa Street, 41st Floor
4 Los Angeles, California 90017
Tel.: 213.426.2500
5 Fax: 213.623.1673
6 MICHAEL J. MOLONEY III (SBN 259140)
mmoloney@goodwinprocter.com
7 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
8 San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: 415.733.6000
9 Fax: 415.677.9041
10 Attorneys for Defendants: ReconTrust Company,
N.A.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems,
11 Inc.; Bank of America; Bank of America Home
Loans, Inc.; BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.;
12 Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; The Bank of New
York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee
13 for Certificate Holders CWALT, Inc. 2006 OA 11
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
OAKLAND DIVISION
17
PENNY L. PATINO; TRUSTEE PENNY L.
Case No. 4:11-cv-00345-CW
18 PATINO'S LIVING TRUST,
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION
19
TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO REMAND
v.
HEARING DATES
20
21 RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
22 REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC.; BANK OF
AMERICA; BANK OF AMERICA HOME
23 LOANS, INC.; BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, L.P.; COUNTRYWIDE HOME
24 LOANS, INC.; THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK
25 AS TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATE
HOLDERS CWALT, INC. 2006 OA 11
26 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES, and Does 1-50,
27
Defendants.
28
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
June 16, 2011
2:00 p.m.
2
Hon. Claudia Wilken
LIBW/1781468.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS AND
MOTION TO REMAND HEARING DATES
Case No. 4:11-cv-00345-CW
Based upon the parties’ Joint Stipulation Regarding Motion to Dismiss and Motion to
1
2 Remand Hearing Dates, dated May 11, 2011, and good cause having been shown, the hearings on
3 defendants ReconTrust Company, N.A.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; Bank of
4 America; Bank of America Home Loans, Inc.; BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.; Countrywide
5 Home Loans, Inc.; and The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee for
6 Certificate Holders CWALT, Inc. 2006 OA 11 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates’ (collectively,
7 “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss, and plaintiff Penny L. Patino’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand,
8 are vacated. The motions are taken under submission on the papers. Plaintiff's opposition to
9 Defendants' motion to dismiss and Defendants' opposition to Plaintiff's motion to remand are due
10 May 26, 2011; replies are due June 2, 2011. The case management conference previously set for
11 June 2, 2011 is continued to July 14, 2011.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
Dated:
May 12
, 2011
HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LIBW/1781468.1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS AND
MOTION TO REMAND HEARING DATES
Case No. 4:11-cv-00345-CW
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
I further certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent
electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing
(NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on
May 12, 2011.
3
4
/s/ Michael J. Moloney III
Michael J. Moloney III
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LIBW/1781468.1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS AND
MOTION TO REMAND HEARING DATES
Case No. 4:11-cv-00345-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?