Patino v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al

Filing 33

ORDER Granting 32 Stipulation Regarding Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Remand Hearing Dates. Case Management Statement due by 7/7/2011. Case Management Conference set for 7/14/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/12/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2011)

Download PDF
1 STEVEN A. ELLIS (SBN 171742) sellis@goodwinprocter.com 2 ALISON M. NORRIS (SBN 248711) anorris@goodwinprocter.com 3 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 601 S. Figueroa Street, 41st Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 90017 Tel.: 213.426.2500 5 Fax: 213.623.1673 6 MICHAEL J. MOLONEY III (SBN 259140) mmoloney@goodwinprocter.com 7 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor 8 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel.: 415.733.6000 9 Fax: 415.677.9041 10 Attorneys for Defendants: ReconTrust Company, N.A.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, 11 Inc.; Bank of America; Bank of America Home Loans, Inc.; BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.; 12 Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee 13 for Certificate Holders CWALT, Inc. 2006 OA 11 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 OAKLAND DIVISION 17 PENNY L. PATINO; TRUSTEE PENNY L. Case No. 4:11-cv-00345-CW 18 PATINO'S LIVING TRUST, ORDER GRANTING JOINT Plaintiffs, STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION 19 TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO REMAND v. HEARING DATES 20 21 RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 22 REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC.; BANK OF AMERICA; BANK OF AMERICA HOME 23 LOANS, INC.; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.; COUNTRYWIDE HOME 24 LOANS, INC.; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK 25 AS TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWALT, INC. 2006 OA 11 26 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, and Does 1-50, 27 Defendants. 28 Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: June 16, 2011 2:00 p.m. 2 Hon. Claudia Wilken LIBW/1781468.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO REMAND HEARING DATES Case No. 4:11-cv-00345-CW Based upon the parties’ Joint Stipulation Regarding Motion to Dismiss and Motion to 1 2 Remand Hearing Dates, dated May 11, 2011, and good cause having been shown, the hearings on 3 defendants ReconTrust Company, N.A.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; Bank of 4 America; Bank of America Home Loans, Inc.; BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.; Countrywide 5 Home Loans, Inc.; and The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee for 6 Certificate Holders CWALT, Inc. 2006 OA 11 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates’ (collectively, 7 “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss, and plaintiff Penny L. Patino’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand, 8 are vacated. The motions are taken under submission on the papers. Plaintiff's opposition to 9 Defendants' motion to dismiss and Defendants' opposition to Plaintiff's motion to remand are due 10 May 26, 2011; replies are due June 2, 2011. The case management conference previously set for 11 June 2, 2011 is continued to July 14, 2011. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 Dated: May 12 , 2011 HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LIBW/1781468.1 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO REMAND HEARING DATES Case No. 4:11-cv-00345-CW 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I further certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on May 12, 2011. 3 4 /s/ Michael J. Moloney III Michael J. Moloney III 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LIBW/1781468.1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO REMAND HEARING DATES Case No. 4:11-cv-00345-CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?