Porter v. Springer et al

Filing 68

ORDER REOPENING CASE, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Settlement Case Management Conference set for 7/5/2012 02:45 PM. VIA TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/4/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OAKLAND DIVISION 7 8 PATRICK K. PORTER, Plaintiff, 9 10 Case No: C 11-00363 SBA ORDER OF REFERENCE vs. 11 DALE ANN SPRINGER, an individual, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 This action was terminated following the parties’ submission of a stipulation for 15 dismissal of all claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint. Dkt. 66. However, it 16 appears that cross-claims involving the Defendants remain unresolved. Accordingly, 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 18 1. 19 20 The instant action is reopened and REFERRED to the Chief Magistrate Judge or her designee for a mandatory settlement conference. 2. The telephonic Case Management Conference currently scheduled for April 21 5, 2012 is CONTINUED to July 5, 2012 at 2:45 p.m. Prior to the date scheduled for the 22 conference, the parties shall meet and confer and prepare a joint Case Management 23 Conference Statement. Counsel for Defendants/Cross-Complainants Jim Vigue and Dr. 24 Tom Hanson is responsible for: (1) filing a joint statement which complies with the 25 Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California and the Standing 26 Orders of this Court no less than seven (7) days prior to the conference date, and (2) setting 27 up the conference call, and on the specified date and time, shall call (510) 637-3559 with all 28 parties on the line. 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 5, 2012 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?