Porter v. Springer et al
Filing
73
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/6/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Kevin R. Martin, SBN 176853
PATTON MARTIN & SULLIVAN LLP
6600 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 250
Pleasanton, California 94566-8058
Telephone (925) 600-1800
Facsimile (925) 600-1802
email: kevin@pattonmartinsullivan.com
Attorneys for Defendants/Cross-Complainants
Dr. Jim Vigue and Dr. Tom Hanson
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PATRICK K. PORTER
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiffs,
v.
DALE ANN SPRINGER, an individual;
BRUCE SPRINGER, an individual; SUZY
PRUDDEN, an individual; DR. JIM VIGUE,
an individual; DR. TOM HANSON, an
individual; LYNETTE OWENS, an individual;
MICHAEL GRADY, an individual;
NEWREALITY LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company; NEWREALITY INC.,
Nevada Corporation
Defendants.
______________________________________
JIM VIGUE and DR. TOM HANSON
Cross-Complainants,
22
23
24
25
26
27
v.
DALE ANN SPRINGER, an individual;
BRUCE SPRINGER, an individual;
NEWREALITY LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company; NEWREALITY INC., a
Nevada Corporation,
Cross-Defendants.
28
PATTON MARTIN &
SULLIVAN LLP
PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00363-SBA
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00363-SBA
ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO:
HONORABLE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG
COURTROOM 1, 4TH FLOOR, OAKLAND
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Complaint Filed: 01-25-11
1
Upon the stipulation of the Parties, by their respective counsel,
2
IT IS ORDERED THAT this action, including all pending claims and counterclaims, is dismissed
3
without prejudice and each party to bear their own costs.
4
5
Date: 7/6/12
6
__________________________________________
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PATTON MARTIN &
SULLIVAN LLP
PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00363-SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?