Porter v. Springer et al

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/6/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Kevin R. Martin, SBN 176853 PATTON MARTIN & SULLIVAN LLP 6600 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 250 Pleasanton, California 94566-8058 Telephone (925) 600-1800 Facsimile (925) 600-1802 email: kevin@pattonmartinsullivan.com Attorneys for Defendants/Cross-Complainants Dr. Jim Vigue and Dr. Tom Hanson 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICK K. PORTER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiffs, v. DALE ANN SPRINGER, an individual; BRUCE SPRINGER, an individual; SUZY PRUDDEN, an individual; DR. JIM VIGUE, an individual; DR. TOM HANSON, an individual; LYNETTE OWENS, an individual; MICHAEL GRADY, an individual; NEWREALITY LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; NEWREALITY INC., Nevada Corporation Defendants. ______________________________________ JIM VIGUE and DR. TOM HANSON Cross-Complainants, 22 23 24 25 26 27 v. DALE ANN SPRINGER, an individual; BRUCE SPRINGER, an individual; NEWREALITY LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; NEWREALITY INC., a Nevada Corporation, Cross-Defendants. 28 PATTON MARTIN & SULLIVAN LLP PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00363-SBA CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00363-SBA ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO: HONORABLE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG COURTROOM 1, 4TH FLOOR, OAKLAND ORDER OF DISMISSAL Complaint Filed: 01-25-11 1 Upon the stipulation of the Parties, by their respective counsel, 2 IT IS ORDERED THAT this action, including all pending claims and counterclaims, is dismissed 3 without prejudice and each party to bear their own costs. 4 5 Date: 7/6/12 6 __________________________________________ United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PATTON MARTIN & SULLIVAN LLP PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00363-SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?