Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Kohler et al

Filing 48

ORDER Granting 47 Stipulation TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE ADR SESSION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/27/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Robert F. Schwartz, SBN 227327
[e-mail]
Clarissa A. Kang, SBN 210660
[e-mail]
Michelle L. Schuller, SBN 255787
[e-mail]
TRUCKER  HUSS
A Professional Corporation
100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7
8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiff
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
ON BEHALF OF LEHMAN BROTHERS
HOLDINGS, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
Trucker  Huss
A Professional Corporation
100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, California 94104

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
ON BEHALF OF LEHMAN BROTHERS
HOLDINGS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

15

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO
COMPLETE ADR SESSION

vs.

16
17

Case No. C-11-00439-CW

THOMAS KOHLER and DIANE KIMSEU
KOHLER,

18
Defendants.
19
20
21

This Stipulation to Continue Deadline to Complete ADR Session is made and entered into

22

by and among Plaintiff Aetna Life Insurance Company (the “Plaintiff”) and Defendants Thomas

23

Kohler and Diane Kimseu Kohler (“Defendants”) (collectively, “Parties”).

24

The Court in its Minute Order and Case Management Order (Doc. No. 31) set October 11,

25

2011 as the deadline for the completion of the Court-ordered ADR session. The Plaintiff and

26

Defendants agree and believe that for purposes of efficiency and conservation of party and judicial

27

resources, it is in the interests of all parties to continue this ADR deadline until twenty-one (21)

28

days after the Court issues a decision on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE;
Case No. C-11-00439-CW
#1201262

1

1

35), which is now pending and is scheduled to be heard on October 13, 2011. No other deadlines

2

in the case would be affected.

3

WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree as follows:
STIPULATION

4
5

Subject to the Court’s approval of this stipulation, the deadline to complete the ADR

6

session shall be continued until twenty-one (21) days after the Court issues a decision on Plaintiff’s

7

Motion for Summary Judgment.

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

9

DATED: September 26, 2011

TRUCKER  HUSS

10

Trucker  Huss
A Professional Corporation
100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, California 94104

11

By: /s/ Clarissa A. Kang
Clarissa A. Kang
Attorneys for Plaintiff Aetna Life Insurance
Company, on behalf of Lehman Brothers
Holdings, Inc.

12
13
14

DATED: September 26, 2011

THE DOLAN LAW FIRM

15
By: /s/ Andrew Klimenko
Andrew Klimenko
Attorneys for Defendants Thomas Kohler and
Diane Kimseu Kohler

16
17
18

I attest that my firm has obtained Mr. Klimenko’s concurrence in the filing of this document.
TRUCKER  HUSS

19
20
21

DATED: September 26, 2011

22
23
24
25
26

By: /s/ Clarissa A. Kang
Clarissa A. Kang
[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The deadline is
continued to Feb. 13, 2012.

9/27/2011
DATED: __________________

27

________________________________________
Hon. Claudia Wilken
Judge of the United States District Court

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE;
Case No. C-11-00439-CW
#1201262

2