Melanson v. Johnson
Filing
23
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ROY A. MELANSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
18
19
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
v.
MARY JOHNSON,
Defendant.
16
17
No. C 11-00446 SBA (PR)
/
Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the Court's Order denying
appointment of counsel.
Rule 60(b) provides for reconsideration only upon a showing of: (1) mistake, inadvertence,
20
surprise or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have
21
been discovered before the court's decision; (3) fraud by the adverse party; (4) a void judgment;
22
(5) a satisfied or discharged judgment; or (6) any other reason justifying relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
23
60(b). Subparagraph (6) requires a showing that the grounds justifying relief are extraordinary.
24
Mere dissatisfaction with the Court's order, or belief that the Court is wrong in its decision, are not
25
grounds for relief under subparagraph (6) or any other provision of Rule 60(b). "'[T]he major
26
grounds that justify reconsideration involve an intervening change of controlling law, the
27
availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.'"
28
Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Hodel, 882 F.2d 364, 369 n.5 (9th Cir. 1989) (quoting
United States v. Desert Gold Mining Co., 433 F.2d 713, 715 (9th Cir. 1970)).
1
Plaintiff presents no grounds that warrant reconsideration. As explained in the Court's Order
2
denying appointment of counsel, there is no constitutional right to counsel in a civil case unless an
3
indigent litigant may lose his physical liberty if he loses the litigation. See Lassiter v. Dep't of
4
Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 25 (1981); Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997) (no
5
constitutional right to counsel in § 1983 action), withdrawn in part on other grounds on reh'g en
6
banc, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). The court may ask counsel to represent an indigent
7
litigant under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 only in "exceptional circumstances," the determination of which
8
requires an evaluation of both (1) the likelihood of success on the merits, and (2) the ability of the
9
plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See id.
at 1525; Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). Both of these factors must be viewed together before reaching a
12
decision on a request for counsel under § 1915. See id. At present, the Court is unable to assess at
13
this time whether exceptional circumstances exist which would warrant seeking volunteer counsel to
14
accept a pro bono appointment. The proceedings are at an early stage and it is premature for the
15
Court to determine Plaintiff's likelihood of success on the merits. Moreover, Plaintiff has been able
16
to articulate his claims adequately pro se in light of the complexity of the issues involved. See
17
Agyeman v. Corrections Corp. of America, 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004). Accordingly,
18
Petitioner's motion for reconsideration is DENIED because appointment of counsel is not necessary
19
at this time.
20
This Order terminates Docket no. 21.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
DATED:
2/1/12
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROY A. MELANSON,
4
5
6
7
Case Number: CV11-00446 SBA
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
MARY JOHNSON et al,
Defendant.
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on February 1, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
13
14
15
17
Roy A. Melanson 117654
Sterling Correcrtional Facility
Box 6000
Sterling, CO 80751
18
Dated: February 1, 2012
16
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
P:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.11\Melanson0446.DenyRECON-Atty.frm
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?