Reynolds et al v. Hologic, Inc. et al

Filing 42

ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 40 Motion for Settlement (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2012)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

REYNOLDS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

7
8
9

ORDER DENYING APPROVAL OF
FLSA SETTLEMENT

HOLOGIC, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

v.

No. C 11-0462 PJH

12

Plaintiffs’ motion for approval of FLSA settlement came on for hearing before the

13

court on July 11, 2012. Plaintiffs appeared through their counsel, Julie I. Vinogradsky, and

14

defendants appeared through their counsel, Gregory G. Iskander. For the reasons stated

15

by the court at the hearing, plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED without prejudice. The parties shall

16

have 30 days to submit a re-styled motion to the court, either as a motion for preliminary

17

settlement approval, or as a motion to decertify the collective class so that the case may be

18

settled outside of the collective action context.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 11, 2012
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge