Reynolds et al v. Hologic, Inc. et al

Filing 52

ORDER re response to plaintiff's objections. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 09/18/2012. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

REYNOLDS, et al.,

6
7

Plaintiffs,
v.

8

ORDER RE RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS

HOLOGIC, INC., et al.,

9

No. C 11-0462 PJH

Defendants.
_______________________________/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
The court has received plaintiffs’ counsel’s response to plaintiff Shella Leahy’s

12

objections to the proposed settlement in the above-entitled action. A look at the exhibit

13

attached to plaintiffs’ counsel’s response (Dkt. 50) shows that much of Ms. Leahy’s

14

personal information is visible and readable. As a result, the court has locked the

15

document. Plaintiffs’ counsel are ordered to re-file the document, with all of Ms. Leahy’s

16

personal information (including her social security number, date of birth, address, phone

17

number) clearly blacked out, so as to make the personal information unreadable.

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
Dated: September 18, 2012
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge