Till et al v. Saks Incorporated et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/28/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2011)

Download PDF
Case4:11-cv-00504-SBA Document28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Filed10/14/11 Page1 of 2 H. Tim Hoffman (SBN 49141) Arthur W. Lazear (SBN 83603) Chad A. Saunders (SBN 257810) HOFFMAN & LAZEAR 180 Grand Ave., Ste. 1550 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 763-5700 Facsimile: (510) 835-1311 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAWN TILL and MARY JOSEPHS Jennifer B. Zargarof (SBN 204382) jzargarof@sidley.com Geoffrey D. DeBoskey (SBN 211557) gdeboskey@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 Attorneys for Defendants SAKS INCORPORATED, SAKS & COMPANY and SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, INC. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 DAWN TILL and MARY JOSEPHS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiffs, vs. SAKS INCORPORATED, a Tennessee corporation; SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, INC., a Massachusetts corporation; SAKS & COMPANY, a New York corporation; and SAKS FIFTH AVENUE OFF FIFTH, , Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:11-cv-00504-SBA Assigned to: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong XXXXXXXXX STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DENY CLASS CERTIFICATION AND REJECT CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION [Complaint filed: February 2, 2011] [FAC filed: March 8, 2011] 26 27 28 LA1 2284769v.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’ MOTION TO DENY CLASS CERTIFICATION AND REJECT CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION Case4:11-cv-00504-SBA Document28 1 Filed10/14/11 Page2 of 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among Plaintiffs Dawn Till and 2 Mary Josephs (“Plaintiffs”) through their counsel, and Defendant Saks Incorporated, Saks & 3 Company, and Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc., (“Saks”) through their counsel, (collectively, the “Parties”) 4 to the following pursuant to Civil L.Rs. 6-2 and 7-12: 5 1. On September 28, 2011 Saks filed its Motion to Deny Class Certification and Reject 6 Conditional Certification (the “Motion”). The hearing on the Motion was set by the Court for 7 February 28, 2012. 8 2. The Parties have met and conferred, and have agreed to the following briefing 9 schedule for the Motion: Plaintiffs must file and serve any opposition papers to Saks’ Motion on or 10 before November 25, 2011 and Saks must file any reply papers on or before December 21, 2011. 11 This is the first request to modify the briefing schedule on Saks’ Motion. 12 4. The Parties reserve the right to seek Court approval for further modification to the 13 briefing or to make other applications to the Court regarding the hearing date and/or briefing 14 schedule in connection with the Motion. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2011 HOFFMAN & LAZEAR 17 18 By: /s/Chad A. Saunders Chad A. Saunders ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS 19 20 DATED: OCTOBER 12, 2011 Sidley Austin LLP 21 22 By: /s/Jennifer B. Zargarof Jennifer B. Zargarof ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 23 24 25 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 10/28/11 Dated: _______________ ________________ 27 Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong Judge of the United States District Court 28 LA1 2284769v.1 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’ MOTION TO DENY CLASS CERTIFICATION AND REJECT CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?