Clerkin et al v. Mylife.com Inc. et al

Filing 142

ORDER Granting 141 STIPULATION For a Revision to Document Production Schedule and Setting Forth Class Certification Briefing Schedule Pursuant to the Court's May 4, 2012 Order. Motions due by 9/28/2012. Response/Cross Motions due by 11/9/2012 .Replies due by 12/14/2012. Replies due by 12/28/2012. Motion Hearing set for 1/17/2013 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken.Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/17/2013 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/8/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 LATHROP & GAGE LLP John Shaeffer (Bar No. 138331) jshaeffer@lathropgage.com Carole Handler (Bar No. 129381) chandler@lathropgage.com Randy Merritt (Bar No. 187046) rmerritt@lathropgage.com 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 789-4600 Fax: (310) 789-4601 Attorneys for Defendants MYLIFE.COM INC. LAW OFFICES OF RONALD JASON PALMIERI, P.C. Ronald Jason Palmieri (CA Bar No. 96953) lawofcsrjp@aol.com 1644 North Orange Grove Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90046 Telephone: (323) 882-8225 Fax: (323) 882-8208 Co-Counsel for Defendant MYLIFE.COM INC. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 16 19 JOHN CLERKIN, VERONICA MENDEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. 20 MYLIFE.COM INC., 17 18 21 22 Defendant. Case No. 4:11-CV-00527-CW [consolidated with Case No. 11-2353 and Case No. 113073] [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR A REVISION TO DOCUMENT PRODUCTION SCHEDULE AND SETTING FORTH CLASS CERTIFICTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO THE COURT’S MAY 4, 2012 ORDER 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 4:11-CV-00527-CW 1 PROPOSED] ORDER 2 In light of the parties’ Stipulation for a Revision to Document Production Schedule and Setting 3 Forth Class Certification Briefing Schedule Pursuant to the Court’s May 4, 2012 Order, the March 12, 4 2012 Order issued by Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins is revised as follows: 5 1. MyLife will continue to process the remaining documents for digital production, and 6 will provide Plaintiffs with new documents on a weekly basis as they become 7 available. MyLife’s weekly production will take place on a weekly basis beginning 8 with Friday, May 11, 2012 and shall continue until completed or June 29, 2012, 9 whichever comes first. 10 2. 11 12 anticipated June 29 completion date. 3. 13 14 MyLife retains its right to request from Plaintiffs and the Court an extension of the Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and supporting papers shall be filed and served on or before September 28, 2012. 4. Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiffs’ class certification motion and its cross-motion for 15 summary judgment, contained in a single brief, shall be filed and served on or before 16 November 9, 2012. 17 5. Plaintiffs’ reply in support of its motion for class certification and response to 18 Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, contained in a single brief, shall be filed 19 and served on or before December 14, 2012. 20 6. 21 22 Defendant’s reply in support of its motion for summary judgment shall be filed and served on or before December 28, 2012. 7. and be held on January 10, 2013 A hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification shall further case management conference shall be held on Thursday, January 17, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. 23 at 2:00 p.m. 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 4:11-CV-00527-CW 1 8. Subject to Court approval, Plaintiffs reserve their right to modify the class certification 2 briefing schedule should Defendant’s production be delayed beyond the anticipated 3 completion date. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 8 DATED: May __, 2012 _____________________________________ Claudia Wilken U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE NATHANAEL COUSINS United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 4:11-CV-00527-CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?