Clerkin et al v. Mylife.com Inc. et al
Filing
142
ORDER Granting 141 STIPULATION For a Revision to Document Production Schedule and Setting Forth Class Certification Briefing Schedule Pursuant to the Court's May 4, 2012 Order. Motions due by 9/28/2012. Response/Cross Motions due by 11/9/2012 .Replies due by 12/14/2012. Replies due by 12/28/2012. Motion Hearing set for 1/17/2013 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken.Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/17/2013 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/8/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
LATHROP & GAGE LLP
John Shaeffer (Bar No. 138331)
jshaeffer@lathropgage.com
Carole Handler (Bar No. 129381)
chandler@lathropgage.com
Randy Merritt (Bar No. 187046)
rmerritt@lathropgage.com
1888 Century Park East, Suite 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 789-4600
Fax: (310) 789-4601
Attorneys for Defendants
MYLIFE.COM INC.
LAW OFFICES OF RONALD JASON PALMIERI, P.C.
Ronald Jason Palmieri (CA Bar No. 96953)
lawofcsrjp@aol.com
1644 North Orange Grove Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90046
Telephone:
(323) 882-8225
Fax: (323) 882-8208
Co-Counsel for Defendant
MYLIFE.COM INC.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
16
19
JOHN CLERKIN, VERONICA MENDEZ,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
20
MYLIFE.COM INC.,
17
18
21
22
Defendant.
Case No. 4:11-CV-00527-CW [consolidated
with Case No. 11-2353 and Case No. 113073]
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
STIPULATION FOR A REVISION TO
DOCUMENT PRODUCTION
SCHEDULE AND SETTING FORTH
CLASS CERTIFICTION BRIEFING
SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO THE
COURT’S MAY 4, 2012 ORDER
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 4:11-CV-00527-CW
1
PROPOSED] ORDER
2
In light of the parties’ Stipulation for a Revision to Document Production Schedule and Setting
3
Forth Class Certification Briefing Schedule Pursuant to the Court’s May 4, 2012 Order, the March 12,
4
2012 Order issued by Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins is revised as follows:
5
1.
MyLife will continue to process the remaining documents for digital production, and
6
will provide Plaintiffs with new documents on a weekly basis as they become
7
available. MyLife’s weekly production will take place on a weekly basis beginning
8
with Friday, May 11, 2012 and shall continue until completed or June 29, 2012,
9
whichever comes first.
10
2.
11
12
anticipated June 29 completion date.
3.
13
14
MyLife retains its right to request from Plaintiffs and the Court an extension of the
Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and supporting papers shall be filed and served
on or before September 28, 2012.
4.
Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiffs’ class certification motion and its cross-motion for
15
summary judgment, contained in a single brief, shall be filed and served on or before
16
November 9, 2012.
17
5.
Plaintiffs’ reply in support of its motion for class certification and response to
18
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, contained in a single brief, shall be filed
19
and served on or before December 14, 2012.
20
6.
21
22
Defendant’s reply in support of its motion for summary judgment shall be filed and
served on or before December 28, 2012.
7.
and be held on January 10, 2013
A hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification shall further case management
conference shall be held on Thursday, January 17, 2013, at 2:00 p.m.
23
at 2:00 p.m.
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 4:11-CV-00527-CW
1
8.
Subject to Court approval, Plaintiffs reserve their right to modify the class certification
2
briefing schedule should Defendant’s production be delayed beyond the anticipated
3
completion date.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
8
DATED: May __, 2012
_____________________________________
Claudia Wilken
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE NATHANAEL COUSINS
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 4:11-CV-00527-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?