Covillo et al v. Specialty's Cafe and Bakery, Inc. et al

Filing 146

ORDER to File Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 02/22/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 NICOLA COVILLO, No. C-11-00594 DMR 13 Plaintiff(s), 14 ORDER TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS v. 15 SPECIALTYS CAFE, 16 Defendant(s). 17 ___________________________________/ 18 19 The court is in receipt of Defendant Craig Saxton’s motion for summary judgment. [Docket 20 No. 137.] The court revised its Standing Order after the filing of this case in 2011, and it now 21 provides that 22 23 24 Motions for summary judgment shall be accompanied by a joint statement of the material facts not in dispute by citations to admissible evidence. If the parties are unable to reach complete agreement after meeting and conferring, they shall file a joint statement of the undisputed facts about which they do agree. Separate statements of undisputed facts shall not be filed and will not be considered by the court. 25 (Standing Order, rev. July 3, 2012.) Defendant Saxton did not file a joint statement of undisputed 26 facts along with his motion for summary judgment. The parties are hereby ordered to meet and 27 confer and to file a joint statement of undisputed facts in compliance with the current Standing 28 1 Order by no later than the date on which Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion for summary judgment 2 is due. 6 Dated: February 22, 2013 DERED O OR IT IS S . Ryu 8 United States Magistrate Judge RT NO onna M DONNAudgRYU J M. e D 7 ER 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 A H 9 R NIA 5 FO IT IS SO ORDERED. LI UNIT ED 4 RT U O S 3 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?