Xilinx, Inc. v. Invention Investment Fund I LP et al

Filing 20

ORDER GRANTING 19 Stipulation, filed by Intellectual Ventures II LLC, Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Intellectual Ventures, LLC, Xilinx, Inc., Intellectual Ventures Management LLC, Invention Investment Fund I LP, Invention Investment Fund II LLC. Signed by Judge Beeler on 2/28/11. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)

Xilinx, Inc. v. Invention Investment Fund I LP et al

Doc. 20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BLACK & WASHKO LLP Frank M. Washko (SBN 252010) [e-mail] Bradford J. Black (SBN 252031) [e-mail] 333 Main Street, Suite 2A San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415-520-6840

JONES DAY Behrooz Shariati (SBN 174436) [e-mail] 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-739-3900

Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff INVENTION INVESTMENT FUND I LP, XILINX, INC. INVENTION INVESTMENT FUND II LP, INTELLECTUAL VENTURES, LLC INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT LLC, INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC, and INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

XILINX, INC., Plaintiff, vs. INVENTION INVESTMENT FUND I LP, INVENTION INVESTMENT FUND II LP, INTELLECTUAL VENTURES, LLC, INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT LLC, INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC, and INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Defendants.

Case No.: 4:11-cv-00671-LB

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Invention Investment Fund I LP, Invention Investment Fund II LP, Intellectual Ventures, LLC, Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC, Intellectual
-1STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00671-LB

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Ventures I LLC, and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (collectively, "Defendants"), pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, respectfully request that the Court enter the following stipulation regarding the time for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties now AGREE AND STIPULATE that the time for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended through and including April 11, 2011. 1. Reason for Extension of Time.

At the request of Defendants, the parties have met and conferred and jointly agree to the requested extension for the convenience of the parties. 2. Prior Time Modifications.

There have been no previous time modifications in this case. 3. Effect of Modification.

The requested extension will have no effect on the rest of the schedule in this action. Respectfully submitted,

Dated: February 28, 2011

BLACK & WASHKO LLP Frank M. Washko Bradford J. Black

By:

Frank M. Washko /s/ Frank M. Washko

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: February 28, 2011

JONES DAY Behrooz Shariati

By:

Behrooz Shariati /s/ Behrooz Shariati

Attorneys for Plaintiff

-2STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00671-LB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Frank M. Washko hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. February 28, 2011 DATED: ____________________

_____________________________________ ED Honorable Laurel BeelerO ORDER S

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

United States Magistrate Judge

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-3STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00671-LB

A

C

LI

FO

au Judge L

rel Beel

er

R NIA

IT IS

NO

RT

H