Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. OEA International, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/22/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012)

Download PDF
1 JEFFREY A. MILLER (SBN 160602) millerj@dicksteinshapiro.com 2 KATIE J.L. SCOTT (SBN 233171) scottk@dicksteinshapiro.com 3 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 700 Hansen Way 4 Palo Alto, CA 94304 (650) 690-9500 5 Telephone: Facsimile: (650) 690-9501 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. HENRY C. BUNSOW (SBN 060707) 8 hbunsow@dl.com BRIAN A.E. SMITH (SBN 188147) 9 baesmith@dl.com D 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 OAKLAND DIVISION CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, Case No. 4:11-cv-00713-YGR [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE vs. OEA INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00713-YGR 1 It appearing to the satisfaction of this Court that all matters and controversies having been 2 compromised by and between the parties, as evidenced by the signatures of their attorneys on the 3 Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, filed herein on May 16, 2012; therefore it is hereby 4 5 6 7 ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiff Cadence Design Systems, Inc. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice; and ORDERED that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs and expenses incurred by or on behalf of said party in connection with this action. 8 9 22 Dated: May ____, 2012 ___________ United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00713-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?