Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. OEA International, Inc. et al
Filing
54
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/22/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012)
1 JEFFREY A. MILLER (SBN 160602)
millerj@dicksteinshapiro.com
2 KATIE J.L. SCOTT (SBN 233171)
scottk@dicksteinshapiro.com
3 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
700 Hansen Way
4 Palo Alto, CA 94304
(650) 690-9500
5 Telephone:
Facsimile:
(650) 690-9501
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
7 CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
HENRY C. BUNSOW (SBN 060707)
8 hbunsow@dl.com
BRIAN A.E. SMITH (SBN 188147)
9 baesmith@dl.com
D
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
OAKLAND DIVISION
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 4:11-cv-00713-YGR
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
CASE WITH PREJUDICE
vs.
OEA INTERNATIONAL, INC., a
Washington Corporation,
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00713-YGR
1
It appearing to the satisfaction of this Court that all matters and controversies having been
2
compromised by and between the parties, as evidenced by the signatures of their attorneys on the
3
Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, filed herein on May 16, 2012; therefore it is hereby
4
5
6
7
ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiff Cadence Design Systems, Inc. be, and the
same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice; and
ORDERED that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs and expenses
incurred by or on behalf of said party in connection with this action.
8
9
22
Dated: May ____, 2012
___________
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00713-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?