Baskin et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 Stipulation, filed by William H. Baskin, Judi M. Baskin, CitiGroup, Inc., CitiMortgage, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/2/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2011)

1
2
3
4

Stuart B. Wolfe (SBN 156471)
Joshua M. Bryan (SBN 225230)
[e-mail]
WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 645
Walnut Creek, California 94596-3502
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendants
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; CITIGROUP, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

Attorneys & Counselors At Law

WOLFE & WYMAN LLP

11

WILLIAM H. BASKIN and JUDI M. BASKIN,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14
15

Case No.: 4:11-cv-00825-SBA

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; CITIGROUP, INC.; and
DOES 1-100, inclusive,

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Defendants.

16
17
18

It is hereby stipulated by and between Joshua M. Bryan, Esq. of Wolfe & Wyman, LLP,

19

counsel for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., CITIMORTGAGE, INC., and CITIGROUP,

20

INC. (“Defendants”) and Stephen C. Ruemann and Robin D. Shofner of RUEHMANN LAW FIRM,

21

P.C., counsel for Plaintiffs WILLIAM H. BASKIN and JUDI M. BASKIN (“Plaintiffs”), that

22

Defendant’s deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint shall have up to and including

23

June 3, 2011 in which to file a response to the First Amended Complaint in order to allow for time to

24

for the parties to discuss potential settlement.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1
SECOND STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC
C:\DOCUME~1\WORKST~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\notes06E812\2nd Stip re extension of time.doc

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2

Respectfully submitted,

3

DATED: April 29, 2011

WOLFE & WYMAN LLP

4
By: /s/ Joshua M. Bryan
STUART B. WOLFE
JOSHUA M. BRYAN
Attorneys for Defendants
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; CITIGROUP, INC.

5
6
7
8
9

DATED: April 29, 2011

RUEHMANN LAW FIRM, P.C.

10

Attorneys & Counselors At Law

WOLFE & WYMAN LLP

11

By: /s/ Robin D. Shofner
STEPHEN C. RUEMANN
ROBIN D. SHOFNER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
WILLIAM H. BASKIN and JUDI M. BASKIN

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

ORDER

20

The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to extend time to file a response to the First

21
22
23
24
25
26

Amended Complaint, and Good Cause appearing therefore, makes the following Order:
Defendants shall have up to and including June 3, 2011 in which to respond to the First
Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _5/2/11____

____________________________________________
Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

27
28
2
SECOND STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC
C:\DOCUME~1\WORKST~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\notes06E812\2nd Stip re extension of time.doc