Baskin et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 Stipulation, filed by William H. Baskin, Judi M. Baskin, CitiGroup, Inc., CitiMortgage, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/2/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Stuart B. Wolfe (SBN 156471) Joshua M. Bryan (SBN 225230) jmbryan@wolfewyman.com WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 645 Walnut Creek, California 94596-3502 Telephone: (925) 280-0004 Facsimile: (925) 280-0005 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; CITIGROUP, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION Attorneys & Counselors At Law WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 11 WILLIAM H. BASKIN and JUDI M. BASKIN, Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 Case No.: 4:11-cv-00825-SBA v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; CITIGROUP, INC.; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 16 17 18 It is hereby stipulated by and between Joshua M. Bryan, Esq. of Wolfe & Wyman, LLP, 19 counsel for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., CITIMORTGAGE, INC., and CITIGROUP, 20 INC. (“Defendants”) and Stephen C. Ruemann and Robin D. Shofner of RUEHMANN LAW FIRM, 21 P.C., counsel for Plaintiffs WILLIAM H. BASKIN and JUDI M. BASKIN (“Plaintiffs”), that 22 Defendant’s deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint shall have up to and including 23 June 3, 2011 in which to file a response to the First Amended Complaint in order to allow for time to 24 for the parties to discuss potential settlement. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 SECOND STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC C:\DOCUME~1\WORKST~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\notes06E812\2nd Stip re extension of time.doc 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 Respectfully submitted, 3 DATED: April 29, 2011 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 4 By: /s/ Joshua M. Bryan STUART B. WOLFE JOSHUA M. BRYAN Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; CITIGROUP, INC. 5 6 7 8 9 DATED: April 29, 2011 RUEHMANN LAW FIRM, P.C. 10 Attorneys & Counselors At Law WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 11 By: /s/ Robin D. Shofner STEPHEN C. RUEMANN ROBIN D. SHOFNER Attorneys for Plaintiffs WILLIAM H. BASKIN and JUDI M. BASKIN 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER 20 The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to extend time to file a response to the First 21 22 23 24 25 26 Amended Complaint, and Good Cause appearing therefore, makes the following Order: Defendants shall have up to and including June 3, 2011 in which to respond to the First Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _5/2/11____ ____________________________________________ Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 27 28 2 SECOND STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC C:\DOCUME~1\WORKST~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\notes06E812\2nd Stip re extension of time.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?