Seebrook v. The Gymboree Corporation
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 11/4/2011. Replies due by 11/18/2011.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/1/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
HOFFMAN & LAZEAR
H. Tim Hoffman (SBN 049141)
Arthur W. Lazear (SBN 083603)
Chad A. Saunders (SBN 257810)
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1550
Oakland, California 94612
Tel: (510) 763-5700
Fax: (510) 835-1311
Email: cas@hoffmanandlazear.com
LAW OFFICE OF NEWMAN STRAWBRIDGE
Newman Strawbridge (SBN 171360)
719 Orchard Street
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Tel: (707) 523-3377
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GALINA SEEBROOK
P. CRAIG CARDON, Cal. Bar No. 168646
ccardon@sheppardmullin.com
BRIAN BLACKMAN, Cal. Bar No. 196996
bblackman@sheppardmullin.com
ELIZABETH S. BERMAN, Cal. Bar No. 252377
eberman@sheppardmullin.com
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4109
Telephone:
415.434.9100
Facsimile:
415.434.3947
Attorneys for Defendant
THE GYMBOREE CORPORATION
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
GALINA SEEBROOK, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
22
Plaintiffs,
23
24
25
26
27
v.
THE GYMBOREE CORPORATION d/b/a
CRAZY 8, a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:11-cv-00839-SBA
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT IN ORDER TO CONDUCT
NECESSARY DISCOVERY
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / CASE NO. 4:11-CV-00839-SBA
1
2
3
Whereas, on February 23, 2011, Plaintiff Galina Seebrook (herein, “Plaintiff”) filed a
class action complaint alleging that Defendant The Gymboree Corporation d/b/a Crazy 8 (herein,
“Defendant”) violated the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act, Cal. Civil Code section 1747.08 by
4
5
6
requesting and recording its customers’ personal identification information in conjunction with
credit card sales transactions;
7
Whereas, to date, the Parties have not conducted any formal discovery in this action;
8
Whereas, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication on
9
10
11
August 16, 2011;
Whereas, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, the deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition to
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment to be filed is currently August 30, 2011;
12
13
Whereas, the Parties have met and conferred, and agree that Plaintiff should have until
14
November 4, 2011 to respond to Defendant’s motion in order to provide Plaintiff with sufficient
15
time to conduct discovery necessary for Plaintiff’s opposition, including (1) the deposition of
16
Donald Hendricks, a declarant in support of Defendant’s motion, (2) written discovery regarding
17
Defendant’s assertion of the “bona fide error” defense as articulated in the motion, and (3)
18
written discovery regarding the point-of-sale system and cashier training policies discussed in the
19
motion and Mr. Hendricks’ declaration; and
20
21
22
Whereas, the Parties further agree that Defendant would have until November 18, 2011 to
reply to Plaintiff’s opposition.
23
Now, therefore, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate, agree, and request:
24
1) That the Court extend Plaintiff’s time to respond to Defendant’s motion for summary
25
26
judgment or summary adjudication until November 4, 2011; and
2) That the Court set Defendant’s deadline to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition as
27
28
November 18, 2011.
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / NO. 4:11-CV-00839-SBA
1
SO STIPULATED.
2
3
Date: August 30, 2011
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
4
By: /s/ Brian R. Blackman
Brian R. Blackman
Attorneys for Defendant
The Gymboree Corporation
5
6
7
8
Date: August 30, 2011
HOFFMAN & LAZEAR
9
By: /s/ Chad A. Saunders
Chad A. Saunders
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Galina Seebrook
10
11
12
ECF ATTESTATION
13
14
15
16
I, Chad A. Saunders, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this:
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN
ORDER TO CONDUCT NECESSARY DISCOVERY
17
18
In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Brian Blackman
19
concurred in this filing.
20
Dated: August 30, 2011
HOFFMAN & LAZEAR
21
22
23
By: /s/ Chad A. Saunders
Chad A. Saunders
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / NO. 4:11-CV-00839-SBA
1
2
3
4
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED
that Plaintiff Galina Seebrook will have up to and including November 4, 2011 to file her
response to Defendant The Gymboree Corporation’s motion for summary judgment or summary
5
6
adjudication (Dkt. 25). It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall have up to and including
7
November 18, 2011 to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary
8
judgment or summary adjudication.
9
Dated:9/1/11
10
____________________________
Hon. Saudra Brown Armstrong
U.S. District Court Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / NO. 4:11-CV-00839-SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?