Seebrook v. The Gymboree Corporation

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 11/4/2011. Replies due by 11/18/2011.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/1/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR
H. Tim Hoffman (SBN 049141)
Arthur W. Lazear (SBN 083603)
Chad A. Saunders (SBN 257810)
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1550
Oakland, California 94612
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
LAW OFFICE OF NEWMAN STRAWBRIDGE
Newman Strawbridge (SBN 171360)
719 Orchard Street
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Tel: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

GALINA SEEBROOK
P. CRAIG CARDON, Cal. Bar No. 168646
[e-mail]
BRIAN BLACKMAN, Cal. Bar No. 196996
[e-mail]
ELIZABETH S. BERMAN, Cal. Bar No. 252377
[e-mail]
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4109
Telephone:
415.434.9100
Facsimile:
415.434.3947
Attorneys for Defendant
THE GYMBOREE CORPORATION

18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21

GALINA SEEBROOK, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

22
Plaintiffs,

23
24
25
26
27

v.
THE GYMBOREE CORPORATION d/b/a
CRAZY 8, a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:11-cv-00839-SBA
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT IN ORDER TO CONDUCT
NECESSARY DISCOVERY

28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / CASE NO. 4:11-CV-00839-SBA

1
2
3

Whereas, on February 23, 2011, Plaintiff Galina Seebrook (herein, “Plaintiff”) filed a
class action complaint alleging that Defendant The Gymboree Corporation d/b/a Crazy 8 (herein,
“Defendant”) violated the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act, Cal. Civil Code section 1747.08 by

4
5
6

requesting and recording its customers’ personal identification information in conjunction with
credit card sales transactions;

7

Whereas, to date, the Parties have not conducted any formal discovery in this action;

8

Whereas, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication on

9
10
11

August 16, 2011;
Whereas, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, the deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition to
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment to be filed is currently August 30, 2011;

12
13

Whereas, the Parties have met and conferred, and agree that Plaintiff should have until

14

November 4, 2011 to respond to Defendant’s motion in order to provide Plaintiff with sufficient

15

time to conduct discovery necessary for Plaintiff’s opposition, including (1) the deposition of

16

Donald Hendricks, a declarant in support of Defendant’s motion, (2) written discovery regarding

17

Defendant’s assertion of the “bona fide error” defense as articulated in the motion, and (3)

18

written discovery regarding the point-of-sale system and cashier training policies discussed in the

19

motion and Mr. Hendricks’ declaration; and

20
21
22

Whereas, the Parties further agree that Defendant would have until November 18, 2011 to
reply to Plaintiff’s opposition.

23

Now, therefore, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate, agree, and request:

24

1) That the Court extend Plaintiff’s time to respond to Defendant’s motion for summary

25
26

judgment or summary adjudication until November 4, 2011; and
2) That the Court set Defendant’s deadline to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition as

27
28

November 18, 2011.
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / NO. 4:11-CV-00839-SBA

1

SO STIPULATED.

2
3

Date: August 30, 2011

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

4
By: /s/ Brian R. Blackman
Brian R. Blackman
Attorneys for Defendant
The Gymboree Corporation

5
6
7
8

Date: August 30, 2011

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR

9
By: /s/ Chad A. Saunders
Chad A. Saunders
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Galina Seebrook

10
11
12

ECF ATTESTATION

13
14
15
16

I, Chad A. Saunders, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this:
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN
ORDER TO CONDUCT NECESSARY DISCOVERY

17
18

In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Brian Blackman

19

concurred in this filing.

20

Dated: August 30, 2011

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR

21
22
23

By: /s/ Chad A. Saunders
Chad A. Saunders

24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / NO. 4:11-CV-00839-SBA

1
2
3
4

ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED
that Plaintiff Galina Seebrook will have up to and including November 4, 2011 to file her
response to Defendant The Gymboree Corporation’s motion for summary judgment or summary

5
6

adjudication (Dkt. 25). It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall have up to and including

7

November 18, 2011 to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary

8

judgment or summary adjudication.

9

Dated:9/1/11

10

____________________________
Hon. Saudra Brown Armstrong
U.S. District Court Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / NO. 4:11-CV-00839-SBA