Howl v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Filing
40
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Settlement. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/13/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
MICHAEL A HOWL,
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
ORDER OF REFERENCE
TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
v.
BANK OF AMERICA NA,
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 11-00887 CW
Defendant.
/
11
12
13
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1 and the suggestion of the
14
ADR unit, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is
15
referred to a Magistrate Judge for settlement conference to be held
16
as soon as possible. The parties will be advised of the date, time
17
and place of appearance by notice from the assigned Magistrate
18
Judge.
19
20
DATED: 9/13/2011
21
________________________________
CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
cc:
Sue; ADR
1
_
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
MICHAEL A HOWL,
No. C 11-00887 CW
5
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE
6
v.
7
BANK OF AMERICA NA,
8
Defendant.
9
/
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee
in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District
of California.
12
13
14
15
That on September 13, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies)
of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid
envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said
copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the
Clerk's office.
16
17
18
Michael A. Howl
PO Box 916
Danville, CA 94526
19
20
21
Dated: September 13, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?