Ally Bank et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
528
ORDER STRIKING AMENDMENT TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/4/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
ALLY BANK, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.,
8
Plaintiffs,
Case No.: 11-CV-896 YGR
ORDER STRIKING AMENDMENT TO FOURTH
AMENDED COMPLAINT, DKT. NO. 527
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
vs.
JAMES C. CASTLE AKA J. CHRISTOPHER
CASTLE, ET AL.,
Defendants.
The Court, on its own motion, STRIKES Plaintiffs’ Amendment to Fourth Amended
Complaint. (Dkt. No. 527.)
Plaintiffs attempt to substitute in two new defendants as “Doe 1 and Doe 2.” As a
17
preliminary matter, there is no Doe 1 named in the Fourth Amended Complaint. More significantly,
18
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not permit Plaintiffs to amend the complaint simply by way
19
of filing an amendment without a prior order. Further, the allegations concerning the Doe defendants
20
in the Fourth Amended Complaint are so insubstantial that any request to amend by simply
21
substituting these new defendants into the complaint as Does would be futile, since no claim would
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
apparently be stated against them without additional factual allegations.
The Clerk shall STRIKE Docket Number 527 from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 4, 2013
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?