Ally Bank et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO. TO SUBMIT PROPOSED FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW re 773 MOTION for Default Judgment by the Court as to Fahed Eweis and Nadia Eweis filed by Chicago Title Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/17/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALLY BANK, et al.,
Case No. 11-cv-00896-YGR (MEJ)
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT
LARA KARAKASEVIC, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 773
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Chicago Title Insurance Company’s Motion for
Default Judgment as to Defendants Fahed Eweis and Nadia Eweis, which has been referred to the
undersigned to prepare a report and recommendation. Dkt. Nos. 773, 778. On February 26, 2015,
the Court directed Plaintiff to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law by March 12,
2015, if no opposition was filed. Dkt. No. 779. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s
directive. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file the proposed findings and conclusions of
law by March 23, 2015. The submission shall be structured as previously directed and include all
relevant legal authority and analysis necessary to establish the case. See February 26, 2015
Notice, Attachment A. Plaintiff shall also email the proposed findings in Microsoft Word format
to email@example.com. No chambers copies is required. For further assistance, Plaintiff is
encouraged to review previous Report and Recommendations that have been issued in this case.
Dkt. Nos. 704, 769.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 17, 2015
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?