Sarkissoff v. JD Enterprises and Financial Services et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 14 Stipulation filed by Michel Ter Sarkissoff. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/30/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/7/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/7/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Mark F. Anderson SBN 44787 Anderson, Ogilvie & Brewer LLP 600 California Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: 415.651.1951 Facsimile: 415.956.3233 Attorney for Plaintiff Michel Ter Sarkissoff 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHEL TER SARKISSOF, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. JD ENTERPRISES AND FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC, Defendants. 14 15 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 11-0979 PJH STIPULATION RE DATE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ORDER Whereas, plaintiff’s attorney is scheduled to be on vacation on June 23, 2011, the date set for the initial Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between counsel for plaintiff Michel Ter Sarkissof 18 and counsel for defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. that the case management conference 19 may be continued to July 7, 2011, at 2:00 PM. 20 (Defendant JD Enterprises and Financial Services, Inc. has been served, but as yet to appear 21 in this action). 22 Dated: June 6, 2011 23 24 ANDERSON, OGILVIE & BREWER LLP By: /s/ Mark F. Anderson Mark F. Anderson Attorneys for Plaintiff Michel Ter Sarkissof STIPULATION RE DATE FOR CMC, SARKISSOF V JD ENTERPRISES, NO. 11-0979 PJH 1 Page Two, Stipulation re Date for CMC 2 Dated: June 6, 2011 3 JONES DAY 4 By: 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 R NIA A H ER n Hamilto hyllis J. LI RT Judge P ERED FO S O ORD IT IS S NO 12 UNIT ED 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 10 N F D IS T IC T O R C 6/7/11 /s/ Eric J. Hardeman Eric J. Hardeman Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?