Eidenmuller v. Groupon, Inc.

Filing 10

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by William Eidenmuller re 7 Case Management Scheduling Order, (Syverson, Patricia) (Filed on 4/13/2011)

Download PDF
1 BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C. 2 ANDREW S. FRIEDMAN (To Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ELAINE A. RYAN (To Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 3 PATRICIA N. SYVERSON (CA 203111; AZ 020191) 2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1000 4 Phoenix, AZ 85012-3311 Telephone: (602) 274-1100 5 Facsimile: (602) 798-5825 6 BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C. 7 TODD D. CARPENTER (234464) 600 West Broadway, Suite 900 8 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 756-6978 9 Facsimile: (602) 798-5825 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 12 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM EIDENMULLER, on behalf of 13 himself and all other Californians similarly situated, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. Case No. CV-11-0984 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 16 GROUPON, INC, a Delaware corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 I hereby certify that a copy of the Case Management Scheduling Order for 21 Reassigned Civil Cases, and this Certificate of Service were served by via U.S. Mail on April 22 13, 2011, to the following: 23 Fredrick Howard Lebron McClure 24 DLA Piper LLP 100 North Tampa Street, Suite 2200 25 Tampa, Florida 33602 Counsel for Defendant Groupon, Inc. 26 27 28 REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 1 1 Edward Colin Thompson DLA Piper LLP 2 100 North Tampa Street, Suite 2200 Tampa, Florida 33602 3 Counsel for Defendant Groupon, Inc. 4 Shirli F. Weiss 5 Christopher Munro Young DLA Piper US 6 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, California 92101-4297 7 Counsel for Defendant Groupon, Inc. 8 Paul J. Hall 9 DLA Piper LLP 555 Mission Street 10 Suite 2400 11 San Francisco, CA 94105 Counsel for Defendant Groupon, Inc. 12 13 14 s/ Patricia N. Syverson PATRICIA N. SYVERSON 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?