Eidenmuller v. Groupon, Inc.

Filing 9

STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint, filed by Groupon, Inc., William Eidemuller. (Young, Christopher) (Filed on 3/30/2011) Modified on 3/31/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SHIRLI F. WEISS (Bar No. 079225) CHRISTOPHER M. YOUNG (Bar No. 163319) NOAH A. KATSELL (Bar No. 217090) DLA PIPER LLP (US) 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, CA 92101-4297 Tel: 619.699.2700 Fax: 619.699.2701 shirli.weiss@dlapiper.com christopher.young@dlapiper.com noah.katsell@dlapiper.com PAUL J. HALL (Bar No. 66084) DLA PIPER LLP (US) 555 Mission Street Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: 415.836.2500 Fax: 619.699.2701 paul.hall@dlapiper.com Attorneys for Defendant GROUPON, INC. . 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 WILLIAM EIDENMULLER, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated and the General Public, Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 21 CASE NO. CV 11-0984 (SBA) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(A) GROUPON, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLA P IPER LLP (US) SAN FRANCISCO EAST\44437846.2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. CV 11-0984 (SBA) 1 2 Plaintiff William Eidenmuller (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Groupon, Inc. (“Groupon”) by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows: 3 1. 4 Groupon. 5 2. On or about March 11, 2011, Groupon was served with the Complaint. 6 3. The time for Groupon to respond to or otherwise answer the Complaint is April 1, 7 8 9 On or about March 2, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this Court against 2011, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. 4. Plaintiff and Groupon agree that Groupon’s deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to and including May 2, 2011. 10 5. No prior extension of time has been sought or granted in this action. 11 6. No dates set by the Court are affected by this stipulation. 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 Dated: March 30, 2011 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 14 15 By /s Christopher M. Young SHIRLI F. WEISS PAUL J. HALL CHRISTOPHER M. YOUNG NOAH A. KATSELL Attorneys for Defendant GROUPON, INC. 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: March 30, 2011 21 BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C. By 22 23 24 /s Elaine A. Ryan ELAINE A. RYAN PATRICIA N. SYVERSON TODD D. CARPENTER Attorneys for Plaintiff WILLIAM EIDENMULLER 25 26 27 28 -1- DLA P IPER LLP (US) SAN FRANCISCO EAST\44437846.2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. CV 11-0984 (SBA) 1 I, Christopher M. Young, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 2 obtained from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the 3 United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 30th day of 4 March, 2011 at San Diego, California. 5 By: 6 7 s/Christopher M. Young CHRISTOPHER M. YOUNG Attorney for Defendant Groupon, Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- DLA P IPER LLP (US) SAN FRANCISCO EAST\44437846.2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. CV 11-0984 (SBA)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?