DFSB Kollective Co., Ltd. et al v. John Does 1 through 10
Filing
21
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 19 Ex Parte Application. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881)
Nicole L. Drey (SBN 250235)
J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp.
517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202
Glendale, California 91206
Telephone:
(818) 500-3200
Facsimile:
(818) 500-3201
andy@coombspc.com
nicole@coombspc.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs DFSB
Kollective Co. Ltd., in conjunction with
Nega Network, Jungle Entertainment,
Foundation Records, Woolim Entertainment,
Aftermoon Music Entertainment, Inc.,
Paragon Music Corp., Roxta Music, and
Spot/Monky Global
10
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)
12
13
DFSB Kollective Co. Ltd., et al.,
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiffs,
v.
Bing Yang, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV11-1051 CW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ALTERNATE SERVICE OF PROCESS
ON DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO
FED. R. CIV. P. 4(f)(3) AND
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME WITHIN
WHICH TO EFFECT SERVICE OF
PROCESS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV.
P. 6(b)
20
WHEREAS Plaintiffs DFSB Kollective Co. Ltd., in conjunction with Nega Network, Jungle
21
Entertainment, Foundation Records, Woolim Entertainment, Aftermoon Music Entertainment, Inc.,
22
Paragon Music Corp., Roxta Music, and Spot/Monky Global (collectively “the DFSB Plaintiffs”)
23
filed their Ex Parte Application to Authorize Alternate Service of Process on Defendants Pursuant to
24
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3) and Request for Enlargement of Time Within Which to
25
Effect Service of Process Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b);
26
WHEREAS the DFSB Plaintiffs have shown good cause why leave should be granted
27
allowing service of the Summons and Complaint in this matter upon the Defendants Bing Yang a/k/a
28
1
________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ALTERNATE SERVICE OF PROCESS AND
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO EFFECT SERVICE
Case No. CV11-1051 CW
1
Yang Bing a/k/a Duong Bang a/k/a Dinh Duong a/k/a Dinh Bang, an individual and d/b/a
2
kpopexplorer.wordpress.com and bingyang.co.cc (“Bing”) and Indrawati Ynag a/k/a Indra Yang
3
a/k/a Indrawati a/k/a mocchalee, an individual and d/b/a asianloud.cc, asianloud.net,
4
koreanmusicswave.blogspot.com, ikpooop.blogspot.com, kpopsounds.blogspot.com,
5
koreanmusicdownload.blogspot.com and kpopsounds.blog127.fc2.com (“Indrawati”) (collectively
6
“Defendants”), via email;
7
8
9
WHEREAS the DFSB Plaintiffs have also shown good cause why an extension of time
within which to serve Defendants should be granted; and
The Court, having read and considered the pleadings, declarations and exhibits on file in this
10
matter and having reviewed such evidence as was presented in regards to Plaintiffs’ Application,
11
hereby grants the DFSB Plaintiffs’ Application, specifically granting leave to the DFSB Plaintiffs to
12
serve Defendants via email and granting a thirty (30) day enlargement of time within which to effect
13
1/29/2012
such service on Defendants, or in no event later than ____________________.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1/3/2012
Dated: ____________________
16
________________________________________
Hon. Claudia Wilken
Judge, United States District Court,
Northern District of California
17
18
19
Presented by:
20
J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp.
21
/s/ Nicole L. Drey
By: ______________________________
J. Andrew Coombs
Nicole L. Drey
Attorneys for Plaintiffs DFSB
Kollective Co. Ltd., in conjunction with
Nega Network, Jungle Entertainment,
Foundation Records, Woolim Entertainment,
Aftermoon Music Entertainment, Inc.,
Paragon Music Corp., Roxta Music, and
Spot/Monky Global
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
_________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ALTERNATE SERVICE OF PROCESS AND
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO EFFECT SERVICE
Case No. CV11-1051 CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?