DFSB Kollective Co., Ltd. et al v. John Does 1 through 10

Filing 21

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 19 Ex Parte Application. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881) Nicole L. Drey (SBN 250235) J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp. 517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202 Glendale, California 91206 Telephone: (818) 500-3200 Facsimile: (818) 500-3201 andy@coombspc.com nicole@coombspc.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs DFSB Kollective Co. Ltd., in conjunction with Nega Network, Jungle Entertainment, Foundation Records, Woolim Entertainment, Aftermoon Music Entertainment, Inc., Paragon Music Corp., Roxta Music, and Spot/Monky Global 10 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION) 12 13 DFSB Kollective Co. Ltd., et al., 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. Bing Yang, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV11-1051 CW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ALTERNATE SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(f)(3) AND ENLARGEMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) 20 WHEREAS Plaintiffs DFSB Kollective Co. Ltd., in conjunction with Nega Network, Jungle 21 Entertainment, Foundation Records, Woolim Entertainment, Aftermoon Music Entertainment, Inc., 22 Paragon Music Corp., Roxta Music, and Spot/Monky Global (collectively “the DFSB Plaintiffs”) 23 filed their Ex Parte Application to Authorize Alternate Service of Process on Defendants Pursuant to 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3) and Request for Enlargement of Time Within Which to 25 Effect Service of Process Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b); 26 WHEREAS the DFSB Plaintiffs have shown good cause why leave should be granted 27 allowing service of the Summons and Complaint in this matter upon the Defendants Bing Yang a/k/a 28 1 ________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ALTERNATE SERVICE OF PROCESS AND ENLARGEMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO EFFECT SERVICE Case No. CV11-1051 CW 1 Yang Bing a/k/a Duong Bang a/k/a Dinh Duong a/k/a Dinh Bang, an individual and d/b/a 2 kpopexplorer.wordpress.com and bingyang.co.cc (“Bing”) and Indrawati Ynag a/k/a Indra Yang 3 a/k/a Indrawati a/k/a mocchalee, an individual and d/b/a asianloud.cc, asianloud.net, 4 koreanmusicswave.blogspot.com, ikpooop.blogspot.com, kpopsounds.blogspot.com, 5 koreanmusicdownload.blogspot.com and kpopsounds.blog127.fc2.com (“Indrawati”) (collectively 6 “Defendants”), via email; 7 8 9 WHEREAS the DFSB Plaintiffs have also shown good cause why an extension of time within which to serve Defendants should be granted; and The Court, having read and considered the pleadings, declarations and exhibits on file in this 10 matter and having reviewed such evidence as was presented in regards to Plaintiffs’ Application, 11 hereby grants the DFSB Plaintiffs’ Application, specifically granting leave to the DFSB Plaintiffs to 12 serve Defendants via email and granting a thirty (30) day enlargement of time within which to effect 13 1/29/2012 such service on Defendants, or in no event later than ____________________. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1/3/2012 Dated: ____________________ 16 ________________________________________ Hon. Claudia Wilken Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California 17 18 19 Presented by: 20 J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp. 21 /s/ Nicole L. Drey By: ______________________________ J. Andrew Coombs Nicole L. Drey Attorneys for Plaintiffs DFSB Kollective Co. Ltd., in conjunction with Nega Network, Jungle Entertainment, Foundation Records, Woolim Entertainment, Aftermoon Music Entertainment, Inc., Paragon Music Corp., Roxta Music, and Spot/Monky Global 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 _________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ALTERNATE SERVICE OF PROCESS AND ENLARGEMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO EFFECT SERVICE Case No. CV11-1051 CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?