MasterObjects, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 Stipulation, filed by Google, Inc. NO HEARING WILL BE HELD. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/8/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

TERRENCE P. McMAHON (SBN: 71910)
[e-mail]
VERA M. ELSON (SBN: 156327)
[e-mail]
VANESSA LEFORT (SBN: 260687)
[e-mail]
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road
Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

9
10

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LLP

11
12
PALO ALTO

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MASTEROBJECTS, INC.,

13

Plaintiff,

14

v.

15

GOOGLE INC.

CASE NO. CV 11-01054 PJH
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR
GOOGLE’S RESPONSE TO AMAZON’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE
RELATED and FOR ANY HEARING

Defendant.

16

Date: No hearing date is required [Civ. L.R. 6-2(b)]

17
18

On Friday, June 3, 2011, Amazon .com, Inc. (“Amazon”) filed an Administrative Motion

19

To Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related (Dkt. 15). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11(b),

20

Defendant Google Inc.’s (“Google”) response to this Motion would be due four days later on

21

Tuesday, June 7, 2011. Plaintiff Masterobjects, Inc., Amazon, and Google, by and through their

22

respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Google to file its

23

response to Amazon’s Motion from June 7 to June 14, 2011; and, to the extent the hearing date of

24

June 15, 2011 that is indicated at Docket Entry 15 is not vacated by the Court’s Docket Entry of

25

June 6, 2011 terminating deadlines, it is hereby stipulated and agreed to extend the hearing date

26

from June 15 to June 22, 2011. The supporting declaration required under Civ. L.R. 6-2 is filed

27

herewith.

28
Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Extend Time for
Google’s Response to Amazon’s Admin. Motion To
Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related and Any Hr’g

CASE NO. CV 11-01054 PJH

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2

Pursuant to General Order 45(X)(B), the filer of this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed]

3

Order, Vera M. Elson, attests that concurrence in the filing of this Joint Stipulation and

4

[Proposed] Order and supporting declaration has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

5
Dated: June 6, 2011

HOSIE RICE LLP

6
By /s/ William P. Nelson
WILLIAM P. NELSON

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MASTEROBJECTS, INC.

8
9
Dated: June 6, 2011

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
LLP

11
By /s/ I. Neel Chaterjee
I. NEEL CHATERJEE

12

Attorneys for
AMAZON.COM, INC.

13
14
15

Dated: June 6, 2011

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

16
By: /s/ Vera M. Elson
VERA M. ELSON
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

17
18
19
20
21

NO

RT

DM_US 28903605-1.088978.0011

hyllis
Judge P

H

ER

28
Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Extend Time for
Google’s Response to Amazon’s Admin. Motion To
Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related and Any Hr’g

-2-

on
J. Hamilt

R NIA

26

FO

25

27

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
_____________________________
TE
C
TA
The Honorable Judge D
O ORD
Phyllis J. Hamilton ERE
IT IS S

6/8/11
DATED: ____________________________

LI

24

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. NO HEARING WILL BE HELD
ON THIS MOTION.

A

23

ORDER

S

22

UNIT
ED

PALO ALTO

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

CASE NO. CV 11-01054 PJH