Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
Filing
95
ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER 93 . Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 3/23/12. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
EMBLAZE LTD.,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
Case No. 11-cv-01079 SBA (NC)
ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY
LETTER
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 93
APPLE, INC.,
16
Defendant.
17
18
The parties filed a joint discovery letter brief in which Apple requests an order compelling
19
Emblaze to produce “full and complete” responses to Apple’s Revised Interrogatory No. 9, as
20
well as documents responsive to Apple’s First Set of Requests for Production, Apple’s Second
21
Set of Requests for Production, and Apple’s First Set of Requests for Admission. See Dkt. No.
22
93.
23
The parties need not submit any additional briefing with respect to this discovery dispute,
24
but Apple must lodge copies of its requests for production and admission, as well as the revised
25
interrogatory at issue, no later than March 28, 2012. Also by March 28, 2012, Emblaze must
26
lodge its responses to the requests at issue. The Court will conduct a telephonic hearing on the
27
matter on April 2, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. Each party must contact courtroom deputy Lili Harrell at
28
415.522.2039 to confirm its participation in the hearing.
Case No. 11-cv-01079 SBA (NC)
ORDER RE: JOINT
DISCOVERY LETTER
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Date: March 23, 2012
4
_____________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01079 SBA (NC)
ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?