Zelis v. Best Buy Co., Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER re 15 Stipulation filed by Best Buy Co., Inc. to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/13/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
Michael A. Geibelson, Bar No. 179970
[e-mail]
Stephanie C. Santoro, Bar No. 260994
[e-mail]
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-229-5800
Attorneys for Defendants
Best Buy Co., Inc.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

L OS A NGELES

A TTORNEYS A T L AW

R OBINS , K APLAN , M ILLER & C IRESI L.L.P.

7

11
12

Jason Zelis, an individual, on behalf
of himself and all other similarly
situated,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

v.
Best Buy Co., Inc. a Minnesota
corporation; and DOES 1 through
50, inclusive,

Case No. CV11 1096 DMR
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 6-1
Complaint Filed: March 9, 2011
Old Response Date: May 11, 2011

Defendants.

17
18

ORDER

19
20

Having considered the Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to

21

Complaint entered into by and between Plaintiff Jason Zelis (“Zelis”) and

22

Defendant Best Buy Co., Inc. (“Best Buy”), and good cause appearing therefore,

23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

24

Plaintiff will amend the Complaint to name Best Buy Stores, L.P., and not

25

Best Buy Co., Inc. within fifteen (15) days of the date of the outcome of either the

26

petition to the U.S. Judicial Multidistrict Litigation Panel or the motion to transfer

27

the action to the Central District of California, whichever occurs first;

28

Plaintiff will dismiss the negligence, invasion of privacy, and unlawful
60474023.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

1

intrusion causes of action within fifteen (15) days of the date of the outcome of

2

either the petition to the U.S. Judicial Multidistrict Litigation Panel or the motion to

3

transfer the action to the Central District of California, whichever occurs first;
Best Buy will have fourteen (14) days from the date Plaintiff files his

5

amended complaint to respond to the amended Complaint, and given Plaintiff’s

6

dismissal of the negligence, invasion of privacy, and unlawful intrusion claims,

7

Best Buy need only respond to the sole remaining cause of action for violation of

8

California Civil Code § 1747.08.

9
10

L OS A NGELES

A TTORNEYS A T L AW

R OBINS , K APLAN , M ILLER & C IRESI L.L.P.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

DATED: May 13, 2011

13

____________________________
The Honorable Donna M. Ryu
Magistrate Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
60474023.1

-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT