Lemus v. Sullivan et al
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO PROVIDE COMPLETE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/5/11. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JUAN CARLOS LEMUS,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 11-1099 PJH (PR)
CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY
EMPLOYEES; DR. E. SULLIVAN, DR.
J. LEE, RN A. COLEMAN, CMO D.
JACOBSEN, B. DIXON, JANE DOES
AND JOHN DOES (1-20), and
DIRECTOR M. CATE (CDCR),
ORDER EXTENDING TIME
TO PROVIDE COMPLETE
APPLICATION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
This is a civil rights case filed pro se by a state prisoner. Page five of plaintiff’s
application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), the “Certificate of Funds in Inmate
Account,” is not completed and signed by a authorized person at the prison. Page five, in
addition to containing calculations of the average income and the average balance in the
inmate’s account, constitutes a certification that the attached printout is true and correct.
The omission of page five means that the attached printout of transactions in plaintiff’s
inmate account is not properly certified, and in any event, the provided printout does not
cover a six-month period, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).
Plaintiff is GRANTED thirty days from the date this order is entered to provide a
complete and proper IFP application. If he does not either pay the fee or provide a proper
application, this case will be dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 5, 2011.
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?