Walker et al v. Ernst & Young LLP

Filing 14

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011)

Walker et al v. Ernst & Young LLP

Doc. 14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Miles N. Ruthberg (Bar No. 086742) Jamie L. Wine (Bar No. 181373) 355 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 213.891.8763 E-mail: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Ernst & Young LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION PHIL WALKER AND LORRAINE WALKER, Plaintiffs, Case No. CV 11-1155 SBA ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ERNST & YOUNG'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-3

13 14 15 ERNST & YOUNG LLP, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
NY\1785051.1

v.

CASE NO. CV 11-1155 SBA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
NY\1785051.1

Having considered Defendant Ernst & Young's Emergency Motion to Extend the Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint, and good cause being shown, the Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendant's time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned matter is extended to such time as ordered by Judge Kaplan in the Southern District of New York or, if transfer is denied, to 30 days following the issuance of an order denying transfer. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _3/17/11 The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

CASE NO. CV 11-1155 SBA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
NY\1785051.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to this action. My business address is Latham & Watkins LLP, 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94111-2562. On March 18, 2011, I served the following document described as: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ERNST & YOUNG'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT by serving a true copy of the above-described document in the following manner: BY U.S. MAIL I am familiar with the office practice of Latham & Watkins LLP for collecting and processing documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Under that practice, documents are deposited with the Latham & Watkins LLP personnel responsible for depositing documents with the United States Postal Service; such documents are delivered to the United States Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business, with postage thereon fully prepaid. I deposited in Latham & Watkins LLP's interoffice mail a sealed envelope or package containing the above-described document and addressed as set forth below in accordance with the office practice of Latham & Watkins LLP for collecting and processing documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service: Phil Walker Lorraine Walker 1705 Clairmont Court Petaluma, CA 94954 I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of, or permitted to practice before, this Court at whose direction the service was made and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 18, 2011, at San Francisco, California.

/s/ Sarah Bergmueller Sarah Bergmueller

1

CASE NO. CV 11-1155 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE