Miller et al v. Security Life of Denver Insurance Company et al
Filing
60
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A CONTEMPT SANCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE TO GEORGE W. SHAEFFER (Dkt. No. 50). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 2/22/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012) (Main Document 60 replaced on 2/22/2012) (feriab, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
DARIUS MILLER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
15
16
17
Case No.: 11-1175 PJH (JSC)
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY A CONTEMPT
SANCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE TO
GEORGE W. SHAEFFER (Dkt. No. 50)
SECURITY LIFE OF DENVER
INSURANCE COMPANY, et. al.,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Defendants’ Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why a Contempt Sanction Should not
issue to George W. Shaeffer (Dkt. No. 50) has been referred to the undersigned Judge. The
hearing on Defendants’ Motion for an Order to Show Cause is scheduled March 1, 2012 at
3:00 p.m. in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San
Francisco, California.
Defendants shall serve Plaintiffs and non-party George W. Shaeffer with a copy of this
order and file proof of service with this Court within three days.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
Dated: February 22, 2012
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?