Miller et al v. Security Life of Denver Insurance Company et al

Filing 72

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying without prejudice 50 Motion for Order to Show Cause (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 DARIUS MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 v. Case No: C11-1175 PJH (JSC) ORDER DENYING CONTEMPT SANCTION AGAINST GEORGE W. SHAEFFER (Dkt. Nos. 50, 51) 15 16 SECURITY LIFE OF DENVER INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 Now pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion joined by Plaintiffs for an Order 20 to Show Cause as to why a contempt sanction should not issue against George W. Shaeffer for 21 failing to appear at a properly noticed and subpoenaed deposition. (Dkt. Nos. 50, 51.) In light 22 of the February 15, 2012 letter from George Schaeffer’s psychiatrist, Dr. David Taylor, stating 23 that Mr. Shaeffer is “extremely and acutely ill” and therefore unable to participate in “in any 24 legal proceedings at this time” (Dkt. No. 62, Ex. A), this motion is DENIED without 25 prejudice. 26 Pamela Shaeffer, George Shaeffer’s wife, appeared on behalf of her husband at the 27 March 1, 2012 hearing held on the motion and represented that she will search for documents 28 in George Shaeffer’s possession relating to Bruce Miller and provide any such documents to 1 Plaintiffs and Defendants. The parties may also contact Pamela Shaeffer in six weeks to 2 determine if George Shaeffer’s health has improved such that a deposition can be scheduled at 3 that time. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: March 2, 2012 _________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?