STEWART v. MONOGRAM BIOSCIENCES
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 5/20/11. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
United States District Court
9
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
14
SIDNEY B. STEWART, an individual,
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
v.
MONOGRAM BIOSCIENCES C/O H. R,
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-01181 DMR
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF IN
FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS
Defendant.
____________________________________/
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On February 8, 2011, plaintiff Sidney Stewart’s pro se complaint for violations of Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and application to proceed in forma
pauperis were transferred from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to the
Northern District of California. On April 26, 2011 plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of a
magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
IT IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and that
the Clerk issue summons.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California
2
serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any amendments, scheduling orders,
3
attachments, plaintiff's affidavit and this order upon the defendant.
4
The Initial Case Management Conference set for June 22, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED.
5
The Court will schedule an Initial Case Management Conference once the U.S. Marshal for the
6
Northern District of California serves a copy of the complaint, any amendments, scheduling orders,
7
attachments, plaintiff's affidavit and this order upon the defendant.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Dated: May 20, 2011
12
13
DONNA M. RYU
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?