STEWART v. MONOGRAM BIOSCIENCES

Filing 24

ORDER re 23 Letter filed by SIDNEY B. STEWART BANNING PLAINTIFF FROM USING THE JUDGE'S PROPOSED ORDER E-MAIL MAILBOX. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 6/9/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

SIDNEY B STEWART,

7

Plaintiff,

8
9

v.

ORDER ON FILLING EX PARTE
COMMUNICATIONS AND BANNING
PLAINTIFF FROM USING THE
JUDGE'S PROPOSED ORDER E-MAIL
MAILBOX

MONOGRAM BIOSCIENCES,
Defendant.
___________________________________/

11
12

On June 9, 2011, Plaintiff Sidney Stewart (“Plaintiff”) submitted another ex parte

13

communication to the court via e-mail, [Docket No. 23], contrary to this court's order of June 7,

14

2011, [Docket No. 21], and the mandate of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. N.D. Cal. Civ. R.

15

11-4(c) (stating that “parties to any action must refrain from making telephone calls or writing

16

letters . . . to the assigned Judge or the Judge’s law clerks or otherwise communicating with a

17

Judge or the Judge’s staff regarding a pending matter, without prior notice to opposing counsel”)

18

(emphasis added). To remedy this occurrence, the court hereby ORDERS that the letter in question

19

be filed on ECF.

20

In addition, the court ORDERS that Plaintiff SHALL NOT communicate directly with the

21

Judge; ORDERS that Plaintiff be BANNED from submitting E-mails via the Judge's Proposed

22

Order E-mail Mailbox; and ORDERS Plaintiff to electronically file all future documents on the ECF

23

system.

S

R NIA

NO

. Ryu
onna M
Judge D

RT

H

ER

FO

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge

27
28

ERED
O ORD
IT IS S

LI

26

Dated: June 9, 2011

A

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

24

UNIT
ED

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C-11-01181-DMR

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C