Li v. Astrue
DISMISSAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 9/29/11. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HAI PING LI
No. C 11-1224 PJH
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
Plaintiff filed this social security appeal on March 11, 2011. Defendant answered on
July 7, 2011. According to Civil Local Rule 16-5, plaintiff was required to file a motion for
summary judgment within 28 days of receipt of defendant’s answer, no later than August 4,
2011. Plaintiff did not do so. Because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, on August 19, 2011,
this court issued a comprehensive order explaining the nature of the summary judgment
motion required and extending plaintiff’s deadline to file the summary judgment motion to
September 16, 2011. The court advised plaintiff that if he failed to respond to that order
and file his motion, the case would be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff failed to
respond to that order.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice for failure
to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The clerk shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 29, 2011
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?