Whitten v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 29

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Parties are directed to submit a joint statement addressing the outcome of the mediation set for 2/16/12, and the need for further mediation in the future. The parties need not submit any additional statement in advance of the 2/27/12 case management conference in this matter. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/30/2012. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DONOVAN WHITTEN, Plaintiff, 9 Northern District of California COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., 12 ORDER RE:CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. 11 United States District Court 10 Case No.: 11-cv-1251-YGR Defendants. 13 14 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: In light of the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement filed January 26, 2012, the parties 15 are directed to submit a joint statement addressing the outcome of the mediation set for February 16, 16 2012, and the need for further mediation in the future. The parties need not submit any additional 17 statement in advance of the February 27, 2012 case management conference in this matter. 18 As set forth in the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases, these conferences are intended to be 19 substantive and productive. Accordingly, each party shall be represented at the Case Management 20 Conference by counsel with authority to enter into stipulations and make admissions pursuant to Fed. 21 R. Civ. P. 16(a) and (c), as well as fully prepared to address all of the matters referred to the CAND 22 CMC Order and Civil L.R. 16-10(b). Failure to do so shall be considered grounds for sanctions. 23 Oakland, California 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 January 30, 2012 ___________________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?