Molex v. The City and County of San Francisco

Filing 77

ORDER re 74 Letter filed by The City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on June 5, 2012. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JEANETTE MOLEX, 9 Plaintiff, Case No.: C-4:11-1282-YGR (KAW) ORDER 10 vs. 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 13 Defendant. 14 15 On June 1, 2012, Defendant filed a request for an extension of time to produce a deponent 16 for deposition. Pursuant to the undersigned's May 31 order, Defendant was required to produce a 17 deponent to testify regarding Plaintiff's Rule 30(b)(6) categories 1 and 4 by June 12. Defendant 18 seeks an extension of time because the deponent, Karl Johnson, is out of the office until June 11. 19 Defendant requests an additional week to produce Johnson for deposition. 20 Plaintiff has not filed a response to defendant's request. Although Plaintiff's supplemental 21 opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment is due on June 15, Plaintiff's brief is limited 22 to the "issue of a policy or longstanding practice for Monell liability." Dkt #71. As Plaintiff has not 23 objected to Defendant's request, and it is not immediately apparent that Johnson's deposition is likely 24 to produce evidence that Plaintiff can use in preparing her brief, the court grants Defendant's request. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 2 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant has until June 19 to produce a deponent to testify regarding Plaintiff's Rule 30(b)(6) categories 1 and 4. 3 4 DATE: June 5, 2012 ___________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?