Daugherty v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 23 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action. Replies due by 11/18/2011.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/17/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2011)

Case4:11-cv-01285-SBA Document40

Filed11/04/11 Page1 of 4

1 JAMES J. BERGMANN (SBN 220447)

Law Office of James J. Bergmann

2 631 5th Street, Suite 201

Santa Rosa, CA 95404

3 Telephone: [phone]

Facsimile: [phone]

4 [e-mail]
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
6

BYRON D. DAUGHERTY

7 TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576)

R. TRAVIS CAMPBELL (SBN 271580)

8 SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP

44 Montgomery St. Suite 3010

9 San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: [phone]

10 Facsimile: [phone]

[e-mail]

11 [e-mail]
12 Attorneys for Defendant

Citibank, N.A., successor in interest to

13 Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

OAKLAND DIVISION
CASE NO. C 11-01285-SBA
18 BYRON D. DAUGHERTY,
Plaintiff,
19
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
vs.
TIME TO FILE REPLY IN
20
SUPPORT OF CITIBANK,
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
N.A.’S MOTION TO COMPEL
21
XXXXXXXXXX
SOLUTIONS, INC.;
ARBITRATION; [PROPOSED]
TRANS UNION LLC;
ORDER
22
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES
23 LLC;
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.;
Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
24 and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive,
25

Defendants.

26
27
28

1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CITIBANK, N.A.’S
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;
[PROPOSED ORDER] CASE NO. (C 11-01285-SBA)

Case4:11-cv-01285-SBA Document40

Filed11/04/11 Page2 of 4

Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Citibank, N.A.,

1

2 successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. (“Citibank”) hereby stipulate
3

to the following:

4
5

1. WHEREAS Citibank filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration on August 19,

6

2011;
7
8

2. WHEREAS Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose Citibank’s Motion to Compel

9
10
11

Arbitration was September 2, 2011;
3. WHEREAS On October 12, 2011, Plaintiff had not filed an opposition to

12
13
14

Citibank’s Motion to Compel Arbitration;
4. WHEREAS On October 12, 2011, Citibank agreed to allow Plaintiff to file

15
16 an opposition to its’ Motion to Compel Arbitration on or before October 14, 2011
17 and Plaintiff agreed to allow Citibank to file an amended reply in support of the
18

Motion to Compel Arbitration on or before 21 days after Plaintiff files his

19
20 opposition.;
21
22

5. WHEREAS On October 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed a stipulation regarding

23 the above agreement between Plaintiff and Citibank (See Doc. No. 36);
24
25

6. WHEREAS On October 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed an opposition to

26 Citibank’s Motion to Compel Arbitration.
27
28

2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CITIBANK, N.A.’S
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;
[PROPOSED ORDER] CASE NO. (C 11-01285-SBA)

Case4:11-cv-01285-SBA Document40

1

Filed11/04/11 Page3 of 4

7. WHEREAS on October 21, 2011, the Court entered Plaintiff and

2 Citibank’s stipulation (See Doc. No. 39).
3
4

8. WHEREAS Citibank’s reply in support of its’ Motion to Compel

5 Arbitration is currently due on or before November 4, 2011.
6
7
8

9. WHEREAS Citibank requires additional time to investigate the issues
raised in Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion to Compel Arbitration.

9
10
11

10. WHEREAS On November 1, 2011, Plaintiff agreed to allow Citibank to
file its’ amended reply in support of the Motion to Compel Arbitration on or before

12
13
14

November 18, 2011.
11. WHEREAS the requested extension of time will have no effect on the

15
16 case schedule as the hearing for the motion is set for January 24, 2012.
17
18

12. THEREFORE Plaintiff and Citibank, by and through their undersigned

19 counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Citibank’s deadline to file its’ amended
20 reply to Plaintiff’s opposition is November 18, 2011.
21
22

IT IS SO STIPULATED

23
24 DATED: November

3, 2011

Law Office of James J. Bergmann

25
26
27
28

By: /s/James J. Bergmann________
James J. Bergmann
Attorney for Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CITIBANK, N.A.’S
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;
[PROPOSED ORDER] CASE NO. (C 11-01285-SBA)

Case4:11-cv-01285-SBA Document40

Filed11/04/11 Page4 of 4

1
2

DATED: November

3, 2011

Simmonds & Narita LLP

3

By: _/s/R. Travis Campbell_________
R. Travis Campbell
Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A.,
successor in interest to Citibank (South
Dakota), N.A.

4
5
6
7
8

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERD.

9
10
11

11/17/11
DATED: ______________________

_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
U.S. District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CITIBANK, N.A.’S
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;
[PROPOSED ORDER] CASE NO. (C 11-01285-SBA)