Daugherty v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 23 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action. AMENDED Replies due by 12/2/2011.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/28/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 JAMES J. BERGMANN (SBN 220447) Law Office of James J. Bergmann 2 631 5th Street, Suite 201 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 3 Telephone: (707)827-1975 Facsimile: (707)827-1979 4 james@consumerlawoffice.net 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 BYRON D. DAUGHERTY 7 TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576) R. TRAVIS CAMPBELL (SBN 271580) 8 SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP 44 Montgomery St. Suite 3010 9 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 283-1000 10 Facsimile: (415) 352-2625 tnarita@snllp.com 11 tcampbell@snllp.com 12 Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A., successor in interest to 13 Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 OAKLAND DIVISION CASE NO. C 11-01285-SBA 18 BYRON D. DAUGHERTY, Plaintiff, 19 SECOND STIPULATION TO vs. EXTEND TIME TO FILE 20 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF EXPERIAN INFORMATION CITIBANK, N.A.’S MOTION 21 SOLUTIONS, INC.; TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; TRANS UNION LLC; ORDER 22 EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES 23 LLC; CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.; Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 24 and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive, 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CITIBANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; [PROPOSED ORDER] CASE NO. (C 11-01285-SBA) 1 Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Citibank, N.A., 2 successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. (“Citibank”) hereby stipulate 3 to the following: 4 5 1. WHEREAS Citibank filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration on August 19, 6 2011(the “motion”); 7 8 2. WHEREAS Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff and Citibank 9 10 filed on October 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed his opposition to the motion on October 14, 11 2011 and Citbank’s amended reply in support of the motion was due on or before 12 November 4, 2011 (see Doc. No. 39); 13 14 15 3. WHEREAS Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff and Citibank filed on November 4, 2011, Citibank’s amended reply in support of the motion was 16 17 18 due on or before November 18, 2011 (see Doc. No. 41); 4. WHEREAS Due to the schedules of Citibank’s client representative and 19 20 Citibank’s counsel, Citibank requires additional time to prepare its amended reply. 21 22 5. WHEREAS On November 15, 2011, Plaintiff agreed to allow Citibank to 23 file its amended reply on or before December 2, 2011; 24 25 6. WHEREAS the requested extension of time will have no effect on the case 26 schedule as the hearing for the motion is set for January 24, 2012; 27 28 1 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CITIBANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; [PROPOSED ORDER] CASE NO. (C 11-01285-SBA) 1 7. THEREFORE Plaintiff and Citibank, by and through their undersigned 2 counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Citibank’s deadline to file its amended reply 3 in support of its Motion to Compel Arbitration is December 2, 2011. 4 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 7 DATED: November 21, 2011 Law Office of James J. Bergmann 8 9 By: /s/James J. Bergmann________ James J. Bergmann Attorney for Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty 10 11 12 DATED: November 21, 2011 Simmonds & Narita LLP 13 14 By: _/s/R. Travis Campbell_________ R. Travis Campbell Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. 15 16 17 18 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERD. 20 DATED: _11/28/11 21 22 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG U.S. District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CITIBANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; [PROPOSED ORDER] CASE NO. (C 11-01285-SBA)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?