Daugherty v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 23 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action. AMENDED Replies due by 12/2/2011.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/28/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)
1 JAMES J. BERGMANN (SBN 220447)
Law Office of James J. Bergmann
2 631 5th Street, Suite 201
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
3 Telephone: (707)827-1975
Facsimile: (707)827-1979
4 james@consumerlawoffice.net
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
6
BYRON D. DAUGHERTY
7 TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576)
R. TRAVIS CAMPBELL (SBN 271580)
8 SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP
44 Montgomery St. Suite 3010
9 San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 283-1000
10 Facsimile: (415) 352-2625
tnarita@snllp.com
11 tcampbell@snllp.com
12 Attorneys for Defendant
Citibank, N.A., successor in interest to
13 Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
OAKLAND DIVISION
CASE NO. C 11-01285-SBA
18 BYRON D. DAUGHERTY,
Plaintiff,
19
SECOND STIPULATION TO
vs.
EXTEND TIME TO FILE
20
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
CITIBANK, N.A.’S MOTION
21
SOLUTIONS, INC.;
TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;
TRANS UNION LLC;
ORDER
22
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES
23 LLC;
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.;
Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
24 and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive,
25
Defendants.
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CITIBANK,
N.A.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;
[PROPOSED ORDER] CASE NO. (C 11-01285-SBA)
1
Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Citibank, N.A.,
2 successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. (“Citibank”) hereby stipulate
3
to the following:
4
5
1. WHEREAS Citibank filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration on August 19,
6
2011(the “motion”);
7
8
2. WHEREAS Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff and Citibank
9
10
filed on October 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed his opposition to the motion on October 14,
11 2011 and Citbank’s amended reply in support of the motion was due on or before
12
November 4, 2011 (see Doc. No. 39);
13
14
15
3. WHEREAS Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff and Citibank
filed on November 4, 2011, Citibank’s amended reply in support of the motion was
16
17
18
due on or before November 18, 2011 (see Doc. No. 41);
4. WHEREAS Due to the schedules of Citibank’s client representative and
19
20 Citibank’s counsel, Citibank requires additional time to prepare its amended reply.
21
22
5. WHEREAS On November 15, 2011, Plaintiff agreed to allow Citibank to
23 file its amended reply on or before December 2, 2011;
24
25
6. WHEREAS the requested extension of time will have no effect on the case
26 schedule as the hearing for the motion is set for January 24, 2012;
27
28
1
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
CITIBANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;
[PROPOSED ORDER] CASE NO. (C 11-01285-SBA)
1
7. THEREFORE Plaintiff and Citibank, by and through their undersigned
2 counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Citibank’s deadline to file its amended reply
3
in support of its Motion to Compel Arbitration is December 2, 2011.
4
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
7
DATED: November 21, 2011
Law Office of James J. Bergmann
8
9
By: /s/James J. Bergmann________
James J. Bergmann
Attorney for Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty
10
11
12 DATED: November
21, 2011
Simmonds & Narita LLP
13
14
By: _/s/R. Travis Campbell_________
R. Travis Campbell
Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A.,
successor in interest to Citibank (South
Dakota), N.A.
15
16
17
18
19
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERD.
20 DATED: _11/28/11
21
22
_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
U.S. District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
CITIBANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;
[PROPOSED ORDER] CASE NO. (C 11-01285-SBA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?