Daugherty v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
63
ORDER Granting 62 STIPULATION Of Dismissal With Prejudice Between Plaintiff And Defendant Trans Union, LLC Only. Trans Union LLC terminated. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 7/9/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Breanne J. Strubinger, Esq. (IN #25823-64)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: bstrubinger@schuckitlaw.com
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
11
Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891)
Sumana Cooppan, Esq. (CSB # 267967)
Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP
315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-433-6830
Fax: 415-433-7104
E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com
scooppan@rbg-law.com
12
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
8
9
10
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
OAKLAND DIVISION
BYRON D. DAUGHERTY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.;
TRANS UNION, LLC; EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; and
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.;
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01285-SBA
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION,
LLC ONLY
23
Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty, by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans
24
Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have
25
been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be
26
dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 4:11-CV-01285-SBA
Page 1 of 3
Respectfully submitted,
1
2
7
s/
James J. Bergmann (w/consent)
James J. Bergmann, Esq.
Law Office of James J. Bergmann
631 5th Street, Suite 201
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Telephone: 707-827-1975
Fax: 707-827-1979
E-Mail: james@consumerlawoffice.net
8
Counsel for Byron D. Daugherty
3
Date: July 8, 2014
4
5
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date: July 8, 2014
s/
Breanne J. Strubinger
Breanne J. Strubinger, Esq. (IN #25823-64)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: bstrubinger@schuckitlaw.com
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
16
21
Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891)
Sumana Cooppan, Esq. (CSB # 267967)
Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP
315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-433-6830
Fax: 415-433-7104
E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com
scooppan@rbg-law.com
22
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
17
18
19
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 4:11-CV-01285-SBA
Page 2 of 3
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is
3
dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty and Defendant Trans Union, LLC
4
shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
5
6
Date: ________________________
7/9/2014
7
____________________________________
JUDGE, United States District Court, Northern
District of California
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DISTRIBUTION TO:
James J. Bergmann, Esq.
james@consuemrlawoffice.net
Eric J. Hardeman, Esq.
ejhardeman@jonesday.com
Katherine Anne Klimkowski, Esq.
kaklimkowski@jonesday.com
Sumana Cooppan, Esq.
Scoopan-wolf@rbgg.com
Thomas P. Quinn, Esq.
tquinn@nokesquinn.com
Stephanie D. Cope, Esq.
scope@kslaw.com
Breanne J. Strubinger, Esq.
bstrubinger@schuckitlaw.com
Michael W. Bien, Esq.
mbien@rbg-law.com
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 4:11-CV-01285-SBA
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?