Daugherty v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 63

ORDER Granting 62 STIPULATION Of Dismissal With Prejudice Between Plaintiff And Defendant Trans Union, LLC Only. Trans Union LLC terminated. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 7/9/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Breanne J. Strubinger, Esq. (IN #25823-64) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: bstrubinger@schuckitlaw.com Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 11 Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891) Sumana Cooppan, Esq. (CSB # 267967) Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-433-6830 Fax: 415-433-7104 E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com scooppan@rbg-law.com 12 Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 8 9 10 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 OAKLAND DIVISION BYRON D. DAUGHERTY, Plaintiff, vs. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS UNION, LLC; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; and CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.; Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01285-SBA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY 23 Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty, by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (“Trans 24 Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have 25 been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union only should be 26 dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 4:11-CV-01285-SBA Page 1 of 3 Respectfully submitted, 1 2 7 s/ James J. Bergmann (w/consent) James J. Bergmann, Esq. Law Office of James J. Bergmann 631 5th Street, Suite 201 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Telephone: 707-827-1975 Fax: 707-827-1979 E-Mail: james@consumerlawoffice.net 8 Counsel for Byron D. Daugherty 3 Date: July 8, 2014 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Date: July 8, 2014 s/ Breanne J. Strubinger Breanne J. Strubinger, Esq. (IN #25823-64) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: bstrubinger@schuckitlaw.com Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 16 21 Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891) Sumana Cooppan, Esq. (CSB # 267967) Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-433-6830 Fax: 415-433-7104 E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com scooppan@rbg-law.com 22 Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 4:11-CV-01285-SBA Page 2 of 3 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is 3 dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty and Defendant Trans Union, LLC 4 shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 5 6 Date: ________________________ 7/9/2014 7 ____________________________________ JUDGE, United States District Court, Northern District of California 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DISTRIBUTION TO: James J. Bergmann, Esq. james@consuemrlawoffice.net Eric J. Hardeman, Esq. ejhardeman@jonesday.com Katherine Anne Klimkowski, Esq. kaklimkowski@jonesday.com Sumana Cooppan, Esq. Scoopan-wolf@rbgg.com Thomas P. Quinn, Esq. tquinn@nokesquinn.com Stephanie D. Cope, Esq. scope@kslaw.com Breanne J. Strubinger, Esq. bstrubinger@schuckitlaw.com Michael W. Bien, Esq. mbien@rbg-law.com 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 4:11-CV-01285-SBA Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?